Skybird |
11-05-08 12:31 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Pathetic essay.
Some people here might be surprisd, but actually I never thought Bush to be an "evil" man. I just think he is incompetent to handle the office, and his dilletantism is the answer to many failures of his. this weaknes left a vacuum that then was all too willingly filled by others, claiming to do things in his name he even was not aware of, and maybe even not caring for things being like this - he maybe even did not want to know. If there is one general mistake of Bush to identify, then that he failed in keeping his house under control. Instead he allowed the servants to run the show not to his but to their views, he allowed them to influence him instead of him inspiring them, and whenever he had to decide soemthing himself, he failed, since he was not used to it. Seen that way, Bush has shown a great heap of incompetence indeed, but on a human level he is not really evil, but tragic.
|
I'm guessing you are missing the point of the "pathetic essay". Do you really think he deserves what he is getting?
|
I think that a very substantial majority of americans and the overwhelming majoirty of the remaining 95% of global population think of him as a plague. If that earns him disgust and mockery, then this is welldeserved, so the answer is Yes. I think in January 2009 the dumbest and most incompetent preident in the history of the Us will be forced to leave office. And that comes eight years too late, if you ask me. He should have never allowed in in the first.
We have had our blind trust in Führers, and that is why we do not value it if others will to pledge loyalty to their leaders blindly, for the sake of the mere principle of loyalty, no matter how bad he is. That kind of robotic loyalty is stupid, a betrayal of the nation, and can become criminal and dangerous. The office over the person, not the other way around. Loyalty then means to be disloyal to the person, and putting the interests of the many and the respect of the office above him. If you be loyal, no matter what, blindly, uncritically, and even if serious damage is being done, you are acting the same way those Wehrmacht officers did when defending thrmselves with that they did not like hitler, and thought he was in competent as a military leader, but that they had to be loyal because he was the Fuhrer. History's verdict on that kind of BS morals has been very clear, I think.
|