SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   What is a Republican (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=142595)

Sailor Steve 09-29-08 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frame57
Have to disagree with you on that one Steve. It is left wing organizations that have have led conspiracy to re-write our history books. With regards to the founding Fathers and references to religion and prayer.

I mentioned banning books, not rewriting history. As to the Founders, religion and prayer, I've spent the last two years making an intensive study of that very topic, and I think it's definitely the Right who want to change the story here. We can have that discussion if you like.

Quote:

It is the democrats who want to enact the "fairness act" in attempts to stifle talk radio and other media that promotes conservative points of view. What is fair is that the dems can do their own radio talk shows and if people like it, great! If not change the station.
I certainly agree with you there. As with books, radio is a free market, and right-wing drivel is certainly what most of us saps like to hear (don't get me wrong, I only compare it to left-wing drivel, which is usually a lot more boring).

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
That's certainly the popular belief but i've never seen anyone produce figures proving or disproving that. What was that quote about telling a big enough lie often enough?

Fair enough point, and at the national level arguably true. But since most banning attempts come at local levels, and most attempts are for moral reasons, and since the Right always tries to claim the religious high ground, I hope you'll forgive me for assuming, and continuing to assume, that that is the source.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/...c=banned_books

Of course, one of the reasons included is "politically incorrect, racist or sexist language" some of it does indeed come from the other side. But you have to admit that the left is less likely to promote banning because of "profanity or violence, sex or sex education, homosexuality, witchcraft and the occult, “secular humanism” or “new age” philosophies".
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~spok/most-banned.html

Morts 09-30-08 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
And BTW how am i supposed to know you are a European if you don't list your location in your user profile, hmmmm?

kinda forgot to add it ? and to your previous post

well thats your opinion, and since you're american..it can be ignored too:D

SUBMAN1 09-30-08 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molon Labe
The biggest attempt at comprehensive censorship in the United States in recent memory was the Communications Decency Act of 1996--passed by a Republican Congress (with bipartisan support) and a Democratic President. (And struck down by a unanimous Supreme Court) The next biggest was a success... the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act. You can argue over who pushes for this kind of **** more, but the truth is that both sides are about equally guilty.

Why don't you post what both those bills represent instead of hiding behind their names.

-S

SUBMAN1 09-30-08 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morts
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morts
biggest load of you know what ive read in a while, actually since last i checked one of your threads subman

(ooh man am i gonna be bashed by august and subman1 for this:rotfl: )

You won't get bashed by me. After all you're entitled to your opinion. It's wrong but you're entitled to be wrong.

so its wrong that ive got an opinion just cause im european ? or do you think what im saying is wrong ?

No, what you're saying is wrong. Because you're a European that means your opinion can be ignored. :D

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: I've had a good laugh this morning thanks to you. Now off to work for me!

-S

GlobalExplorer 09-30-08 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
No, what you're saying is wrong. Because you're a European that means your opinion can be ignored. :D

Are you joking, or saying this is an internal US affair? Or did I overestimate your intelligence?

August 09-30-08 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxtrot
Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
What is a Republican


WHAT I AM . . . is a man who believes in God; a God who has blessed this country . . . and all for which it stands.

Sorry to say but he is doing a piss poor job for a long time. :shifty:

God...your plans suck. You should resign immediately. :arrgh!:

Unlike you he is at least not ashamed to put his location down... :up:

August 09-30-08 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobalExplorer
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
No, what you're saying is wrong. Because you're a European that means your opinion can be ignored. :D

Are you joking, or saying this is an internal US affair? Or did I overestimate your intelligence?

Gee I thought the smiley was obvious enough but maybe I overestimated YOUR intelligence... :up:

GlobalExplorer 09-30-08 08:32 AM

It's not a smiley it's a grin and as we're all talking monkeys that display of teeth and glee makes me VERY ANGRY!!

August 09-30-08 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobalExplorer
It's not a smiley it's a grin and as we're all talking monkeys that display of teeth and glee makes me VERY ANGRY!!

Please don't throw feces at me. :o

McBeck 09-30-08 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobalExplorer
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
No, what you're saying is wrong. Because you're a European that means your opinion can be ignored. :D

Are you joking, or saying this is an internal US affair? Or did I overestimate your intelligence?

Both of you are making this either personal or about US vs Europe.
Keep it clean and not personal...thank you :arrgh!:

Morts 09-30-08 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morts
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morts
biggest load of you know what ive read in a while, actually since last i checked one of your threads subman

(ooh man am i gonna be bashed by august and subman1 for this:rotfl: )

You won't get bashed by me. After all you're entitled to your opinion. It's wrong but you're entitled to be wrong.

so its wrong that ive got an opinion just cause im european ? or do you think what im saying is wrong ?

No, what you're saying is wrong. Because you're a European that means your opinion can be ignored. :D

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: I've had a good laugh this morning thanks to you. Now off to work for me!

-S

You're not welcome :up: :rotfl:

August 09-30-08 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McBeck
Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobalExplorer
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
No, what you're saying is wrong. Because you're a European that means your opinion can be ignored. :D

Are you joking, or saying this is an internal US affair? Or did I overestimate your intelligence?

Both of you are making this either personal or about US vs Europe.
Keep it clean and not personal...thank you :arrgh!:

Or we're just kidding around with each other. Hence the smileys...

McBeck 09-30-08 12:00 PM

Very well...hard to tell the difference between VERY sarcastic and plain fun - I asume the first.

RickC Sniper 09-30-08 01:07 PM

Quote:

WHAT I AM . . . is a man who grew up during the Depression and witnessed, first hand, the effects of the Stock Market crash and the soup lines that followed. I watched as both my parents and grand parents, who had very little themselves, share what food they had with a half dozen other families, who had even less.
He is 52 years old and grew up during the Depression? My math is bad but not THAT bad.

sharkbit 09-30-08 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RickC Sniper
Quote:

WHAT I AM . . . is a man who grew up during the Depression and witnessed, first hand, the effects of the Stock Market crash and the soup lines that followed. I watched as both my parents and grand parents, who had very little themselves, share what food they had with a half dozen other families, who had even less.
He is 52 years old and grew up during the Depression? My math is bad but not THAT bad.

Quote:

WHAT I AM . . . first and foremost, is a loving husband of some 52 plus years, the father of four and an American who's proud of his country. . . and his country's heritage.
He's been married 52 years, not 52 years old.
:)

Tchocky 09-30-08 01:26 PM

The Republican is a relatively large Strepsirhine primate, belonging to the family Conservidae. The only species in the monotypic genus Publis, it is found only on the island of Madagascar.

Biggles 09-30-08 02:15 PM

http://media.tumblr.com/fSymsOGXOcju...0YrNRZ_500.gif
My current interest about what the republicans really are is displayed above...

Frame57 10-01-08 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
Quote:

Originally Posted by Frame57
Have to disagree with you on that one Steve. It is left wing organizations that have have led conspiracy to re-write our history books. With regards to the founding Fathers and references to religion and prayer.

I mentioned banning books, not rewriting history. As to the Founders, religion and prayer, I've spent the last two years making an intensive study of that very topic, and I think it's definitely the Right who want to change the story here. We can have that discussion if you like.

Quote:

It is the democrats who want to enact the "fairness act" in attempts to stifle talk radio and other media that promotes conservative points of view. What is fair is that the dems can do their own radio talk shows and if people like it, great! If not change the station.
I certainly agree with you there. As with books, radio is a free market, and right-wing drivel is certainly what most of us saps like to hear (don't get me wrong, I only compare it to left-wing drivel, which is usually a lot more boring).

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
That's certainly the popular belief but i've never seen anyone produce figures proving or disproving that. What was that quote about telling a big enough lie often enough?

Fair enough point, and at the national level arguably true. But since most banning attempts come at local levels, and most attempts are for moral reasons, and since the Right always tries to claim the religious high ground, I hope you'll forgive me for assuming, and continuing to assume, that that is the source.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/...c=banned_books

Of course, one of the reasons included is "politically incorrect, racist or sexist language" some of it does indeed come from the other side. But you have to admit that the left is less likely to promote banning because of "profanity or violence, sex or sex education, homosexuality, witchcraft and the occult, “secular humanism” or “new age” philosophies".
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~spok/most-banned.html

Where shall we start! With the inscription on the liberty bell or that Ben franklin himself requested that every session of Congreess begin with prayer...I have very old history books that are clearly different from the latest ones used in schools today. The shift is of recent and not the other way around. The national archives have all the evidence to support the history before it was hijacked. I am well prepared on this matter and it will be an interesting discussion.

Onkel Neal 10-01-08 02:14 PM

I read this and was initially inclined to think it was an urban legend...surprise! It's true. http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/whatiam.asp

More power to you, Mr. Esseff. You proved the American Dream, and you have nothing to be ashamed of except the misfortune to be surrounded by have-nots who blame you for their lack of success in life.

Sailor Steve 10-01-08 02:53 PM

[quote=Frame57]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
Where shall we start! With the inscription on the liberty bell or that Ben franklin himself requested that every session of Congreess begin with prayer...

The same Ben Franklin who requested Congress open with prayer was branded a heretic and even an atheist by religious leaders of his own day. Of course the reason was that he questioned the honesty and sincerity of those leaders.
http://americanrevolutionblog.blogsp...-stand_27.html

However, his actual stated beliefs would earn him similar treatment by any serious Christian leader today.
http://www.beliefnet.com/resourcelib..._Stiles_1.html

Franklin believed, but he expressed doubts about the divinity of Jesus, which would, I believe, earn him the wrath of modern evangelicals were he to enter the political arena today.

Likewise Jefferson, who told his nephew Peter Carr to "Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear."
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/jefferson_carr.html

This was the kind of thing that led Christian leaders of his own time to oppose his presidency and label him and atheist.

Quote:

I have very old history books that are clearly different from the latest ones used in schools today. The shift is of recent and not the other way around. The national archives have all the evidence to support the history before it was hijacked.
If we're talking about school textbooks, then I agree, to a point. Schoolbooks are always being rewritten to suit the times, and it's good to oppose it, if for no other reason than to keep the conversation alive. I dislike history books in general, unless they are tightly focused on a specific subject. I have come to prefer biographies of late, as they tend to give not only the subject's own writings and thoughts, but also those of his contemporaries. Last year I read Dumas Malone's massive six-volume, 3500-page biography of Jefferson, which led me on an entertaining journey through seven more books, culminating in Annette Gordon-Reed's Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings.

But I'm also fond of 'different' history books. Two favorites: Who Were The Founding Fathers, by Steven H. Jaffe http://www.amazon.com/Who-Were-Found.../dp/0805031022 which doesn't try to explain them, but rather shows what they thought of themselves and each other, then goes on to show from each generation's writings what they thought of the Founders, including their attempts to use those men's words to support a variety of different, and often conflicting, causes; which brings us back to the subject at hand.

The second is Moral Minority: Our Skeptical Founding Fathers, by Brooke Allen http://www.amazon.com/Moral-Minority.../dp/1566636752 She is biased toward atheism, or at least unbelief, but she makes some good points about what each of the big six (Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison and Hamilton) actually believed, or at least what can be culled from their own writings and the opinions of those who knew them.

Oh, and as to the Pennsylvania State House Bell (its original name), all the inscription shows is that Isaac Norris, who ordered it, was indeed a Christian, as were (presumably) all of his Quaker fellows. Except for those like Ben Franklin, who was definitely not a Quaker.

Quote:

I am well prepared on this matter and it will be an interesting discussion.
I hope so (on both counts).


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.