Already happened. I won. SB was so upset about it, he blocked me permanently for the 3rd time after not being able to return logic for logic. Hahahaha! :lol: :rotfl: This was after of course he threatened to stab me with his Samurai sword.


This thread needs some life. Let's add some campaign posters here!

http://members.cox.net/melc29/NObama.jpg

http://members.cox.net/melc29/9.jpg

-S

Very funny list. Equally as funny is the one from the other side posted by Enigma.

If you think either one is funny because it points to certain stereotypes that have some basis in truth but not actually that much, then you understand that all humor is based on exaggeration.

If, on the other hand, you think either one is funny because it's absolutely true but the other is a pack of slanderous lies then you are more than a little limited in your thinking.

Actually he blocked you after he got tired of you posting opinion and innuendo and calling it logic.

They are both funny! :D I am just a little busy today to take the normal number of posts as I normally would. Been hours since I last logged on. Must leave again.

-S

Show my an opinion in that grouping. I used links.

-S

I'm on the infamous Sh*tlist as well. Gotta laugh how SB thinks it's actually any kind of punishment. Talk about inflated self-importance. :lol: SB got his undies in a knot at me because I wouldn't allow his wacky pro-Russian/anti-West propaganda without challenge. He couldn't handle it when I had the audacity to express the notion that the Russians are not an invincible entity that everyone is dependant on, and the West/NATO is not exactly a weakling with nothing to offer. How dare I. :88)

Anyway.....I like the posters.

:rotfl:

When we had that 'other' debate you repeatedly posted links to someone else's opinions, and then got upset when I ignored your 'facts'. Is this one different?

If you're referring to me, I didn't get upset at you on that other debate. I recognized our disagreement, and still was able to disagree with you cordially. I even said I respected where you came from. I also expressed admiration for your Constitutional knowledge and upmost regard for liberty. And I didn't have to place you on ignore. ;) Nor do I ever feel the need to place anybody on ignore, even for disagreeing with me. Yes. There is a world of difference.

And no, I used my own opinions there.

Bad timing on the cross-posting. I was answering the one above yours.
:rotfl:

22. You have to believe that there is no such thing as personal responsibility.

23. You don't believe in personnal accountability (unless it's the fault of a conservative.)

A nice addition of rot to an already rot filled list. :rotfl:

Ya'll are so funny....

Tick tick. Tick tick.

You're almost as combative as Skybird.;)

Yeah, it's a shame that at the moment you can't spam the subsim forum with more anti-democrat posts.

My apologies, no idea what that means mate.

Maybe he can just resort to the SB method of putting everyone on ignore. Another typical way to avoid debate for those with left leaning/anti-Western tendencies.

Oh don't forget,

25. Money is not earned, but is confiscated by the government to be distributed equally.

26. #25 is to be called "fairness". If you disagree you may be guilty of a "hate crime" against the poor and people of color.

It's meant to be a compliment, of course.:rotfl:

whats this about the dems getting funds from the chinese??

I've never heard anything like that before??

Google Bill Clinton and China and campaign.

or here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Un...ce_controversy

That would be very popular in hawaii.:up:

It must be getting close to November:roll: .