SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Med expansion pack dissed in PC Zone

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- Silent Hunter III (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=182)

- - Med expansion pack dissed in PC Zone (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=97956)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wulfmann

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capt USA

Cant wait to see what THEREALWULFMAN has to say about this thread http://foolstown.com/sm/gy.gif http://foolstown.com/sm/kngt.gif http://foolstown.com/sm/hmm.gif

I was waiting to get the link as I only reply to SW things when I feel I have to defend myself from ignorant childish statements

I too want the link to read this. How many times do I need to say I play my own heavily modded Greywolves/NYGM? (OK, I admit I do run some Salamis patrols in SW when I have less time for my preferred GW 1943/44 North Atlantic convoy attacks)

I am not afraid of what PC gamers opinion is and would like to see if their negative comments are in line with my suggestions for SW that were ignored.

While I only gave historical advise and beta tested the fantasy crowd has made me CEO of X-1 (I have never exchanged a single email with X-1, as I have said) but by now I have been the cause for problems in the Middle East as well as who kidnapped the Lindbergh baby! And, I am not hiding Saddam’s WMDs!

Wulfmann

I must admit you do appear to have become the whipping boy for X1's SHIII expansion packs on this forum!

Nemo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wulfmann

...but by now I have been the cause for problems in the Middle East as well as who kidnapped the Lindbergh baby! And, I am not hiding Saddam’s WMDs!

Wulfmann

Damn, I was about to blame you for Argentina loosing his last soccer match with Brasil..

Ref

ps: You're sure you have nothing to do with that ?

Joke mode on.

Wulfmann, I stumped my toe today...sure you weren't in Nijmegen between 19:00 and 20:40?:D ;) :|\\ :huh: :hmm:

Joke mode off.

Seriously though, I wouldn't like it if all of this anti-X1 business -which is justified by itself- evolves into an anti-Wulfmann witch hunt.

Kind regards,

Eichenlaub

Come on, guys. Leave Wulf alone for god´s sake! We´re on SubSim, not the UBI forums. He wants to defend the mod, fine, let him do that. Enough is enough. :dead:

Now, someone please scan the review or point us to online review, if there´s one. :up:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly

Come on, guys. Leave Wulf alone for god´s sake! We´re on SubSim, not the UBI forums. He wants to defend the mod, fine, let him do that. Enough is enough. :dead:

Yeah, its freedom of speech. And by the way, i'm getting kinda tired of that X1 discussion....:yep:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly

HERE BLOODY WELL HERE!!!....please can we all move on :D

Dammit! I was fixing to spend $250 for that and now I dont know...............wait.........oops sorry, I was thinking of my brazilian wax job.

Nevermind.

Here you go guys - sorry for the delay - got back from my hols yesterday

http://www.imageholder.net/171b02536e.thumb.jpg

http://www.imageholder.net/171b02536e.thumb.jpg

help - I have the scan as a jpeg on my desktop - how do I get it on this forum ? I am using Imageholder but it doesn't seem to work !

Its 1.35mb - is it too big ?

Failing posting ot here - I can email it you if you like. Drop me a mail to sam@naji27.plus.com and I will reply with the scan of the article

cheers

Upload it to www.rapidshare.de

When I get it, I upload it to my Filefront account.

Or you can e-mail it me directly to TeemuSiekkinen666@gmail.com

It´s now on filefront, the name of the file is <edit>

<Edit: Sorry Dowly, but that is a copyrighted article and Neal cold be in a world of trouble here. Not a lot different from posting a link to a Warez site. JCC>

here here well said in that article finally some magazine is realizing that x1 r a bunch of thiefs.

Careful boys I belive that may be copyrighted material.

One sure way to get the article is to buy the magazine :know:

BTW take a close look at the Bumper image ! Its kinda funny.

Certainly don't disagree with the details in that article :arrgh!:

Good! I'm glad to see it get the "Smacketh Downeth" that it deserves! :rock: