![]() |
Of course there are free speech in many countries, where USA is one of them.
I also know that beside having this free speech you have also a responsibility for what comes out of your mouth. Alex should have when the first report of death threats against some of these parents have stopped right there. In fact he so to say in his weekly speech encourage his followers to continue. (This is taken from a Danish news paper, who had an article some month ago) The verdict should have been prison-Cause he has no possibility to pay such a huge amount. Secondly. I hope they get these listerne who have sent death threats to these parents. Sending death threats has nothing to do with free speech. Markus |
I encourage everyone in need of a good laugh to go watch videos of the trial. Especially the one's with Alex Jones giving testimony. It's comedy gold. :haha:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The part where you can't separate the government repressing free speech from a civil suit for damages.
|
Quote:
Well, a prison term is a verdict given in a criminal case (by the state). The Alex Jones case was a civil lawsuit. |
Quote:
You know the right wingers' definition of free speech, do you? "I can say what I want, so shut the f* up!" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here Alex would have stand trial in an ordinary court-Criminal case. I guess he would have been accused of defamation(Trying to find the English word for Injurier, which is more accurate than defamation) I copied following from Danish Criminal law Quote:
Here a person who is convicted and can't pay-Will be prisoner and the state will pay the money to the victim. Markus |
Quote:
And as before: Jones‘ right to free speech has not been limited in any way. He just has to learn that actions have consequences and that there are not just rights in this world but also responsibilities. |
|
Quote:
DEFAMATION Defamation is a statement that injures a third party's reputation. The tort of defamation includes both libel (written statements) and slander (spoken statements). State common law and statutory law governs defamation actions, and each state varies in their standards for defamation and potential damages. Defamation is a tricky area of law as the lines between stating an opinion versus a fact can be vague, and defamation tests the limits of the first amendment freedoms of speech and press. Elements To prove prima facie defamation, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and 4) damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject of the statement. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.