Thanks gents (and thanks Polak),

Yes, I've been working on ironing out a few bugs for the last couple of days now (plus getting plumbing fixed, seeing relatives, etc.).

The naval gunfire training mission is basically done - just trying to squash one 'ctd' bug.

:roll:

Cheers,
Stew

Are you sure during real Urgent Fury USN made naval gunfire excercises?
Waht is point to make long training mission in real operation background?

Im sure gunfire training is NOT what everyone expected from:
You just another one proved my words - you announces "epic" scenario but you focus on not important details/events.

Sorry for the slight delay (was out of town for 3 days visiting relatives).

My NGFS Training Mission is now up on the downloads section - https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/dow...o=file&id=5625

Included is a fully detailed map of the Lesser Antilles, scheduled ship's bells, boatswain's calls and plan of the day, detailed NGFS serials, ASW serial and helo vertrep.

https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/dow...erwood_vN5.jpg

Readme:
Hopefully it's a bit of fun ;)
Stew

Wise words I hope all will adhere to.

Let us all try to get on with each other and if anyone has difficulty in doing so they always have the option to ignore.

I suggest you to use this option if you have problem with understanding simplest things.

I'll try to enlighten you in as light and as politely a way as I can....

As the senior moderator on this forum it is one of Neals expectations of me that I keep things on as even a keel as possible.

When matters are brought to my attention as is the case regarding this thread, I attempt to calm the waters in as light a fashion as possible.

There are other more harsher means at my disposal but I sincerely hope this post will suffice so I'll end this post now by thanking you in anticipation of your understanding and co-operation.

It is really that simple.

I suggest you to follow your advise about "ignore option" if you still don't understand. All what i wrote before is pure truth and all knows its about @stewy1 mission designing style. I could use "someone" word but it would be rally dumb when all knows it wos about Stewy1. Maybe you like to make circus on forum but i don't. So if its problem to you, just follow your advise and turn on "ignore" option.

If you think i broke any rules, just show which one insteas makind misterious suggestions. Do you understand now? You should because your funcion "senior moderator" needs some intelligence - so im sure now you understood.

-----------------------
About mission.
I've launched this scenario and in my opinion its very boring with tons of text for readind and no fun. Training scenario do not allows you to little autonomous actions. You should follow path designed by mission creator. So you can forgot about "unconventional tactics, brave actions and "thinking". All you have to do is follow orders.

This is training missions are very boring. In battle, you have lots of tactics. For example you can go very fast to take good attack positions. Or delay engaging and track targets for looking best opportunity to actions.
In Land gun fire training all you can do its going towards training destination point and use your gun to fulfill very enigmatic and long briefing.

This mission is made for admiring dozens of messages and scripts but without any authonomy for player. Commander havent chances to prove his tactic skill.

I'd suggest you read the rules and in particular the section "Bans, Brig time, user infractions, and multiple or duplicate accounts"

https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/faq...vb_faq#faq_ban

I respect rules, if you have different opinion please show me details.

What we are asking for is your cooperation. We try to keep a friendly atmosphere here. If something about the Grenada Mission has upset you, say your piece and then let it go.

Why you think im not cooperate or something upset me?
I think your intervention is because something upset you - not me.

@imbuna by his action did something opposite to rule below:
Why you think calling someone by nickname is wrong? Can you explain it to me?
I understand my opinion about mission design style isn't nice for @Stewy1. But its my honest opinion, backed by arguments. And forum is for discussion so i don't understand why you wanna cut discussion. Why you suggest discussion is wrong?

@Jimbuna reminded anybody can ignore thread, post or someone. It was rude from his side because it was suggestion agains me. But i know @stewy1 isn't child and he can accept different point of view. Btw I helped him many times before and i haven't problems with it in future. So maybe @Jimbuna should read again rule above because what he did it in opposite to this rule.