SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Err Victor III using stand off airborne torpedos?

Page 2 of 2

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- COLD WATERS (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=268)

- - Err Victor III using stand off airborne torpedos? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=232117)

jenrick

06-28-17 07:39 PM

Inertial guidance is about all I can think of off the top of my head. At very close range a laser might work as well.

-Jenrick

Shadow

06-28-17 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jenrick (Post 2495864)

Inertial guidance is about all I can think of off the top of my head. At very close range a laser might work as well.

-Jenrick

There is a mention of one "GOLIS autonomous inertial guidance" system.

ikalugin

06-29-17 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow (Post 2495813)

From Wikipedia:

Rudimentary guidance is not a problem for a nuclear strike, but you need a lot more precision for a conventional warhead. I wonder what kind of terminal guidance would work in this case, considering the Shkval is blinding itself to some extent with its supercavitation's bubble. Not to mention the nose of the torpedo's taken up by the supercavitator.

non acoustic, but then those follow up variants never finilised.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.

Page 2 of 2

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page