SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Sub & Naval Discussions: World Naval News, Books, & Films (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=186)
-   -   Russian 'Lira' ('Alfa') Submarines (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=224186)

Kapitan 02-27-16 08:10 AM

true but i think the only things they will take away from alfa class is the automation small crew sizes which if you look at current submarines they have less crew then western boats.

take akula almost the same size as a 688 has a crew of around 65 where the 688 has a crew of nearly 130, i think the whole alfa idea is good and it was a design screw up that went in the designers favor.
perhapse a cheaper steel hulled version would be a good sign but i think the russians will continue to create the hybrid SSGN models as they have more flexability.

ikalugin 02-27-16 01:53 PM

There is discussion around building smaller SSNs to compliment Yasen class, but the size here is due to the desire to keep the costs down (Yasens are viewed as expensive/redundant).

Automation experience from Alfas was used in the 3rd and 4th gen submarines. It is not directly applicable to modern subs, as the Alfas were viewed as non maintainable subs (ie crew does not do the maintenance), meaning that modern crews would be larger than those of Alfas.

Mr Quatro 02-28-16 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kapitan (Post 2384812)
true but i think the only things they will take away from alfa class is the automation small crew sizes which if you look at current submarines they have less crew then western boats.

take akula almost the same size as a 688 has a crew of around 65 where the 688 has a crew of nearly 130, i think the whole alfa idea is good and it was a design screw up that went in the designers favor.

Good points, but hard to understand why ...

http://news.usni.org/2014/10/28/u-s-...an-attack-boat
Quote:

Severodvinsk is the most capable Russian attack submarine ever built and ... vessel with a crew of only 32 officers and 58 enlisted submariners. ...
I noticed on some submarines the russians have more officers than enlisted men ... that's really hard to understand. Who gets the blame then if something goes wrong :D

ikalugin 02-29-16 03:36 AM

Historically this can be atributed to two factors:
- small crews due to high automation (Alfas were more or less run purely by officers).
- bias towards officers due to the sailors being conscripted.

Mr Quatro 03-24-16 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subnuts (Post 2379616)
Really cool imgur gallery on the Alfa with construction pics and diagrams: http://imgur.com/a/WyJ20

Your right subnuts, this link leads to some really cool pictures and information about Alfa class submarines.

You know how sometimes a person will save a link, but not really go there?
That's what I did back in February ... this morning I was bored and saw the link in my favorites folder for subsim.

My respect for Russian tech advances went up a bit higher ... how did they ever get the big boys with the money to approve of this I will never understand.

What else is lurking in their minds while the budget is low, ready to produce as soon as they can get more oil money into their banks?

Kapitan 03-24-16 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Quatro (Post 2392149)
Your right subnuts, this link leads to some really cool pictures and information about Alfa class submarines.

You know how sometimes a person will save a link, but not really go there?
That's what I did back in February ... this morning I was bored and saw the link in my favorites folder for subsim.

My respect for Russian tech advances went up a bit higher ... how did they ever get the big boys with the money to approve of this I will never understand.

What else is lurking in their minds while the budget is low, ready to produce as soon as they can get more oil money into their banks?

While the budget is certainly alot lower than in soviet times, the Russian federation still maintains the 3rd largest defence budget in the world and its expect this year to rise to $96bn USD

In contrast the UK budget is $60bn while the american budget is some $630bn

ikalugin 03-25-16 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Quatro (Post 2392149)

What else is lurking in their minds while the budget is low, ready to produce as soon as they can get more oil money into their banks?

Defense (and other critical) spending is balanced against the stable incomes such as non oil/gas/foreighn trade taxes.

Kapitan 03-25-16 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikalugin (Post 2392364)
Defense (and other critical) spending is balanced against the stable incomes such as non oil/gas/foreighn trade taxes.

Very correct which means your total spending in percentage to GDP is around 4.5% expected to rise to 4.7% this year.
The USA on the other hand has declined from 4.6% in 2011 to 3.5% in 2014.

Figures obtained from the world bank data pool

At the moment due to low oil prices Russia is hurting plus the sanctions what is it now over there 70ruble to 1 USD ?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.