http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/data...8r0/rr+P7P/9k=http://images.hngn.com/data/images/f...im-jong-un.jpg
Yes it's north of South Korea!!:timeout:

AHH!! Please don't show me anymore:dead:

Only one thing scares him more than a nuke...

http://i.imgur.com/Mj7b3CH.jpg

Fixed.
Back to normal :03:

I'll wager if we sit back and watch for a while it'll simply float away.

Well STEED, I wish Uncle Kim would send this band over here, I'd love to see them,lol I could care less if they can sing too!:D

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/...z&ocid=U351DHP

I shall phone Kim. :D

They might fare better than their southern counter-parts....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/articl...ng-sex-workers

It should be pointed out that there is no evidence NK has been able to weaponize a fission device yet.

:haha::haha:

If we sit back and wait long enough He'll probably blow himself up!!:haha:

Switching from conventional to nuclear deterence would allow him to cut military spending and send more resources to fixing the economy. So in a way this can lead to a more stable, prosperous and less dangerous DPRK.

The problem is in the tech profilation, they already share missile tech they have (not top of the line but it works) and we don't want them to share nuclear tech.

Snag with cutting military spending in a place like the DPRK is that if you cut military spending then you lose military based employment, and there's not a great deal of industry in the DPRK that the people who are not in the armed forces can go into, and people without jobs and with military training are a revolution waiting to happen.
Besides, cutting the armed forces goes against Songun, and I can't see Kim Jong-un doing that, or even being allowed to do that.

Unbelievable Oberon!