SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Great Book...MUST READ! (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=206776)

Bubblehead1980 08-19-13 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 2102504)
You are ALL COMMUNISTS I tell ya, I seen the secret memo about your nefarious plot to take control of the treehouse.

DEFLECTION.Sad, yet amusing.

mookiemookie 08-19-13 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 (Post 2102506)
I have read that before and this was nothing more than a hit piece, author was wrong, going after Goldwater and the Conservative movement or the "pseudo conservative" movement as called it. I am sorry, but conservatives have been proven right.

Hmm...it's almost as if Bub never actually read the book, but just read the first review on Amazon and then wrote this post making it seem like he read the book...hmm....

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2IIP02...55&store=books

Oberon 08-19-13 10:46 AM

http://007investigatingmedia.files.w.../picture-2.png

Bubblehead1980 08-19-13 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subnuts (Post 2102496)
Still waiting for Everyone to the Left of Me Is A Communist: Why People Who Don't Think Like Me Really Piss Me Off.

Political books need to have more honest titles.

No, but the people mentioned in this book are communists or progressives, which is just the new name for communists. Honestly, look at who these people admire, follow, associate with etc. I'll never forget the Obama admin member...Anita Dunne I think her name was who said she admired MAO! MAO! This is not isolated, this is a common theme in the modern left.People are entitled to think what they want but when their beliefs(communist, socilist, progressive whatever) is so contradictory to the US constitution and what our country believes, they are not qualified to run it.

The greatest victory the left has had is convincing people the communist types are not a threat, it is sad.

Tribesman 08-19-13 10:52 AM

Quote:

DEFLECTION.Sad, yet amusing.
Young man, that is no deflection.
That is treating the content of the OP with all the merit it deserves.

Quote:

Hmm...it's almost as if Bub never actually read the book, but just read the first review on Amazon and then wrote this post making it seem like he read the book...hmm....
I hope you are not suggesting bubbles is just making stuff up:03:

Bubblehead1980 08-19-13 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie (Post 2102509)
Hmm...it's almost as if Bub never actually read the book, but just read the first review on Amazon and then wrote this post making it seem like he read the book...hmm....

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2IIP02...55&store=books

No.There you go again, try to tear me down instead of offering something to counter because you have no argument. Instead you make ridiculous insinuations.You are, ugh nevermind.

Bubblehead1980 08-19-13 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 2102516)
Young man, that is no deflection.
That is treating the content of the OP with all the merit it deserves.


I hope you are not suggesting bubbles is just making stuff up:03:

You make things up, you make accusations etc because don't like what I have to say, typical left wing tactic.Like I said, read the book, it's well sourced.Should open your eyes, then again, you can lead a horse to water...

Takeda Shingen 08-19-13 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 (Post 2102506)
I have read that before and this was nothing more than a hit piece, author was wrong, going after Goldwater and the Conservative movement or the "pseudo conservative" movement as called it. I am sorry, but conservatives have been proven right.

Those who opposed the new deal saw the danger of that much government intervention and power, they knew the government would never cede the power again.They knew in the short term it would not help(it did not, WW II saved the economy) then when they argued against the great society they were said to be heartless, when they opposed the civil rights act of 64 they were called racist.They opposed it because the act was garbage and the saw the ramifications of such things as affirmative action.Did the oppose this because they are racist? Sure, some did. Just like now, many of the things passed by non whites is because they are racist.The push for "immigration reform" is racist. Were all racist? No.They saw the big picture, giving the federal government one inch is dangerous, because they will then take a mile.

Now fast forward all these years later.We have a country in debt due to the welfare state, we have a government with power it was never supposed to have.Spying on people, torturing people, prosecuting journalists under the espionage act, simply because they are mad about their crimes being exposed, attempting to control our healthcare, socially engineering the military and society(attempting to) and all the other evil that comes from a large, bureaucracy that is not constrained.

McCarthy went overboard and lost support but he was absolutely right about subversion by communists and other far left types.Goldwater was right about many things and if american people would not have been so easily duped(like they were in 2008 and 12) we would have a better country now, not the cesspool we currently have.

You know you have just proven Hostadter's point, right? Of course you don't; you haven't read the book. You won't read it either because you are happy with your paranoia. In other words, you are the problem.

And by the way "nuh-uh" is still not a counter argument. Go. Read. Learn. Then talk. But read and learn first.

Catfish 08-19-13 11:09 AM

If people have prejudices, wouldn't it be a good idea to at least update those, from time to time ?
:hmmm:

Tribesman 08-19-13 11:16 AM

Quote:

You make things up, you make accusations etc because don't like what I have to say, typical left wing tactic.Like I said, read the book, it's well sourced.Should open your eyes, then again, you can lead a horse to water...
That's the second person this past week making the same silly claim.
So young man, provide a single example from anywhere on this forum to back up your ridiculous claim, or take your special place in the naughty corner.
BTW doesn't "well sourced" from that blogger translate as wild speculation and crazy assumption with an unhealthy dose of conspiracy theory and a hearty helping of loony ideology driven agenda?
Objective much?:rotfl2:

Bubblehead1980 08-19-13 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen (Post 2102525)
You know you have just proven Hostadter's point, right? Of course you don't; you haven't read the book. You won't read it either because you are happy with your paranoia. In other words, you are the problem.

And by the way "nuh-uh" is still not a counter argument. Go. Read. Learn. Then talk. But read and learn first.

No I did not prove his point.Basically, he said that there is no threat, that those who talk about communists etc, the conservatives are just paranoid, crazy whatever.What a great way to go after the opposition. I don't know enough about the author to know if he was communist etc himself or if he honestly just did not see the threat. The problem with so many people is they refuse to see the threat, its complacency at it's worst.

Takeda Shingen 08-19-13 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 (Post 2102534)
No I did not prove his point.Basically, he said that there is no threat, that those who talk about communists etc, the conservatives are just paranoid, crazy whatever.What a great way to go after the opposition. I don't know enough about the author to know if he was communist etc himself or if he honestly just did not see the threat. The problem with so many people is they refuse to see the threat, its complacency at it's worst.

The reason, dear Bubblehead, that you are so bad at this sort of thing is because you refuse to read the material. If you want to be some sort of great polemicist, which is what seems to your goal, then you have to do your homework. You cannot be lazy.

You are commenting on a book that you have clearly never read. Read it. Then try to talk about it, because you have now, for a second time, proven the author's point. Again, this is why you get beat in these sort of arguments. Your base of knowledge simply isn't wide enough, and you are getting to the end of the age bracket where youth and inexperience serves as an excuse.

Bubblehead1980 08-19-13 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen (Post 2102539)
The reason, dear Bubblehead, that you are so bad at this sort of thing is because you refuse to read the material. If you want to be some sort of great polemicist, which is what seems to your goal, then you have to do your homework. You cannot be lazy.

You are commenting on a book that you have clearly never read. Read it. Then try to talk about it, because you have now, for a second time, proven the author's point. Again, this is why you get beat in these sort of arguments. Your base of knowledge simply isn't wide enough, and you are getting to the end of the age bracket where youth and inexperience serves as an excuse.

Tribes, you poor soul. I could say the sky is blue and you would argue against it, because it's personal for you.There are some on here who simply disagree with, there are two, you and one other other, where it's personal for you guys.Perhaps you know what I say is true, I attack your crazy ideology and pull no punches, the left relies on restraint from opponents.Really though, unless you have an actual response, do not talk to me.

Takeda Shingen 08-19-13 12:00 PM

I'm not Tribesman.

Ducimus 08-19-13 12:11 PM

Dunno why, just thought i'd toss this out there.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Liberty-Am.../dp/1451606273

If i was to sit down and read a book. I might read that one. As it is, I very much doubt i'll sit down and read any book for awhile.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.