SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Scottish Independence?

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Scottish Independence? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=191393)

Surely the pressing questions on the referendum must be...
Who gets whats left of the North Sea oil/gas
Who gets to pay for Dounreay

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herr-Berbunch (Post 1819323)

One that sets a budget for a new building of, err, let's say £10m.

But then has costs of £414m.

:doh:

Scotland takes out more than it puts into the pot, so I'm interested to see how long free tuition and prescriptions last.

*Edit - I know that all building costs associated with any government spiral out of control, but over x40 is really funny.

:hmmm:

You have been reading to many spin stories by Maggie

Quote:

Notice what's missing from the economists' discussion: an argument about whether an independent nation could pay its way. That's partly because, so soon after Salmond's rout, the terms of separation are vague ***8211; how much of the oil revenues would go to Edinburgh; the public debt that Westminster would dump on Holyrood; even what currency it would adopt over the long run. But it's also because those Kelvin MacKenzie-isms about Scotland the Subsidy Junkie are ***8211; shock! ***8211; not wholly true.
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...st-Ren-007.jpg
Wind turbines in East Renfrewshire: could wind power offer a new economic miracle for Scotland? Photograph: Murdo Macleod

The last set of figures from Holyrood statisticians show that for 2008-9, Scotland provided £1.3bn more in revenue than was spent north of the border. At less than 1% of Scotland's GDP, that's not a huge surplus, and it does include a due share of North Sea revenues. Strip out crude and the deficit goes up sharply, to £10.5bn (or 9% of GDP).
If those were your family's accounts you wouldn't want to be depending on one source of income that yo-yos so much (oil prices hit a record-high in 2008). But beware of double standards: hardly anyone put such objections to chancellor Gordon Brown during the bubble years.

As one of the apparently few Scots on this site I was going to jot some things down, but I can't be bothered now, to be honest. I'm kind of sick of the frothing nonsense I've seen on the Internet over the last few days from every side of argument. Maybe later if I'm less tired.

So, I'll just go with the Daily Mash Instead...

Independant Scotland Could be exactly the Same.

EDIT: link fixed, I hope.

Sure. Be all calm and reasonable why don'tcha? :O:

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee (Post 1819348)

Will Kratos be king?:shucks:

OH YES!! :DL

The best poll returns I have seen are 38% of Scots in favour of independance.

Good luck to them if that is what is eventually decided...but they need to realise they will have to factor in defence costs because there are fewer Scottish regiments than there have been in the past and the RAF and RN are truly British/English.

Add to that they receive far more than they put into the pot and I'm confident the average Scot will realise it is far more beneficial they remain part of the Union.

As much as I dislike Cameron, he is playing a canny game and the final outcome will more than likely be the public humiliation of Alex Salmond.

http://spreadhead.files.wordpress.co...ond-rabbit.png

Call me an idiot..........
But didn't Scotland get thier freedom with BraveHeart?
:06:

Quote:

Originally Posted by privateer (Post 1819580)

Call me an idiot..........
But didn't Scotland get thier freedom with BraveHeart?
:06:

Yes, but then some English Monks invented Buckfast and that did for us.

Gits :woot:

Cheers

Garion

So, Jim, as friend of the King (Kratos, not Elvis), would he give you a land grant and make you Lord Buna (or Baron von Neukastle):shucks:? Not sure what titles goes with that?

Would this mean that the base at Faslane would be split between England and Scotland à la Sevastopol? With half the fleet going to the RN and the other half to the Scottish Navy?

... what am I saying, the Royal Navy doesn't have anything left to split between anyone! :haha:

For the new Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers, England can have the flight deck, Scotland can have the hanger and Wales can manage the elevators (sorry, lifts). They can switch round on the last day of the month.

More seriously 38% doesn't seem like much but regimes have changed with far less plurality. After digging a bit deeper, seems like the PM might be playing chicken with the issue to embarrass the separatists and polarize their base.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1819638)

... what am I saying, the Royal Navy doesn't have anything left to split between anyone! :haha:

I seem to recall there are three vessels just of the coast of the Netherlands. :smug:

Oh dear! :oops:

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1819638)

Would this mean that the base at Faslane would be split between England and Scotland à la Sevastopol? With half the fleet going to the RN and the other half to the Scottish Navy?

I thought I read yesterday, in the OP article, that an independant Scotland wanted nothing to do with "the nuclear submarines near Glasgow". I'll be darned if I can find it in the article now.

I can see why, that is one narrow transit into that port. Shock trials weren't even that hairy.