SUBSIM Radio Room Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   At sea three times and already they broke it... (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=191153)

Rockstar 01-05-12 10:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1814951)
Exhaust Ports huh? I'm guessing that if we fire a shot in to those that the whole battle station err aircraft carrier will be destroyed. I'm betting its ray shielded so we will have to use Proton Torpedoes.
Proton Torpedos? Probably overkill. I'm sure just shoving a potato up the exhaust will do just fine :D

Osmium Steele 01-05-12 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1814951)
Exhaust Ports huh? I'm guessing that if we fire a shot in to those that the whole battle station err aircraft carrier will be destroyed. I'm betting its ray shielded so we will have to use Proton Torpedoes.

I'm guessing it going to turn out something like this...

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=29d_1256477821
http://obamiconme.pastemagazine.com/...gif?1232691446

soopaman2 01-05-12 02:45 PM
Chinese military equipment is so cute...

Too bad everything they make is reverse engineered western tech. Taking a page out of the old soviet union playbook, steal, not innovate.

Works well right?

Well it at least looks threatening to the gwai lo, or laowai.

magicstix 01-05-12 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1815993)
Chinese military equipment is so cute...

Too bad everything they make is reverse engineered western tech. Taking a page out of the old soviet union playbook, steal, not innovate.

Works well right?

Well it at least looks threatening to the gwai lo, or laowai.
Don't be ridiculous...



They steal from Russian tech too. :D

kraznyi_oktjabr 01-05-12 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by magicstix (Post 1815994)
Don't be ridiculous...



They steal from Russian tech too. :D
...and from americans as well. Did you know that their standard issue light weight ASW torpedo is an improved* copy of Mark 46?


*"improved" in this case means merging best features of stolen american and european torpedo technologies

soopaman2 01-05-12 03:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kraznyi_oktjabr (Post 1816016)
...and from americans as well. Did you know that their standard issue light weight ASW torpedo is an improved* copy of Mark 46?


*"improved" in this case means merging best features of stolen american and european torpedo technologies

Well to be the best you have to learn (steal) from the best

:arrgh!:Argghhh matey:arrgh!:

Karle94 01-05-12 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kraznyi_oktjabr (Post 1816016)
...and from americans as well. Did you know that their standard issue light weight ASW torpedo is an improved* copy of Mark 46?


*"improved" in this case means merging best features of stolen american and european torpedo technologies
Didīt they use over 20 years to "reverse engineer" the old version of the Mark 48 torpedo?

magicstix 01-05-12 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kraznyi_oktjabr (Post 1816016)
...and from americans as well. Did you know that their standard issue light weight ASW torpedo is an improved* copy of Mark 46?


*"improved" in this case means merging best features of stolen american and european torpedo technologies
I assume you mean the YU-7? Joke's on them, the Mk-46 is a little piece of junk. ;P They didn't technically reverse engineer that one, we basically told them how to build them and sold them a bunch.

kraznyi_oktjabr 01-05-12 07:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by magicstix (Post 1816128)
I assume you mean the YU-7? Joke's on them, the Mk-46 is a little piece of junk. ;P They didn't technically reverse engineer that one, we basically told them how to build them and sold them a bunch.
You are correct. I forgot you handed them over to Chinese (which in my opinion wasn't smartest of thigns to do) but I'm in understanding that Chinese were supposed to do only assembly work and didn't get full tech transfer.

Its true that in today's standards 46 mod 2 is somewhat obsolete technology like (in my understanding) Alenia's A244-S. Intresting question is how capable combination of those technologies really is? Also, how much Chinese have put in their own little modifications?

TLAM Strike 01-05-12 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by magicstix (Post 1816128)
...we basically told them how to build them and sold them a bunch.
I thought we left some at Cam Rah Bay by mistake. I also heard a fishing trawler picked one up but that might have been a MK 48. :hmmm:

magicstix 01-05-12 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1816149)
I thought we left some at Cam Rah Bay by mistake. I also heard a fishing trawler picked one up but that might have been a MK 48. :hmmm:
Their program got started by them picking up a few that they found, and ended with us selling them several hundred MK-46v2s as well as providing support on how to build them.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.