![]() |
Quote:
Besides, to be honest wouldn't it be WWIV? We're already in WWIII with the 'War on Terror' (TM). |
Old Chucky Dudley Warner once wrote, in 1870, "so true is it that politics makes strange bedfellows".
It is my opinion that economics makes strange bedfellows also. :know: It is amazing how political, social, and cultural differences between countries can be overlooked when considering profit. And I don't think this is a bad thing. |
Quote:
That said, If we were to go to war with China, id further wager that it wouldn't be for some time - after they've had a decade or three of playing "build up" and "catch up". At which point, give our current circumstances which will only get worse during that time period, I think the only way we'd win that open war with China is if the entire country mobilized like it did in WW2. At which point, said war would either make us (as WW2 did), or break us. |
Quote:
|
If you ask me, a war between China and Russia is more likely. All those raw materials in Siberia, mmmmmmmm :Kaleun_Salivating:
Plus, China is in active trade with the US, like you said, her best customer, while Russia is more of a competitor, trying to break into the market. Especially with energy, Russia has a lot of it and China will soon need it. But Russians won't sell cheap Plus they share a land border. |
Quote:
I think that American politics is directed by future perspective its just it may be matter of perspective weather its good one or bad. On another hand USA as a democracy must look at its domestic problems while realising its plans as strategies. |
Unfortunately Max Hastings is long past his "Best Before" date and this essay is just fear-mongering jingoism. There will be no Sino-American shooting war unless the USA wants one and is prepared to start it.
That is not to say there will be all sweetness and light in their relations of course. The real danger lies in the perpetual US election cycle and the political needs of domestic politics for a foreign enemy to focus hyperbole in Congress, the Senate and the media. Should America decide that it requires continued hegemony in Asia and within what the PRC considers its security sphere, there are certainly potential areas for conflict but none of these are really vital to America's security as they are for China's. The problem is that they be perceived as essential to America's self-image as the Guardian of Freedom and Democracy so U.S. paranoia, rhetoric and propaganda will determine what future crisis' go hot. |
Quote:
http://assets.fundoofun.com/video_pi...1320131133.jpg http://angrywhitedude.com/wp-content...0/image001.png http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ls...dpsfo5_250.gif |
I remember a report on China, some years ago on swedish tv and they said that as the country grows so does it's need for resources to
Some one hade post some pictures of their claim from others countries, such as Japan, Australia a.s.o If there's gonna be a war between USA and China it will be indirectly. China goes to was against some neighbor over some resources and that's how USA could get involved. Markus |
So if china get's all war like, who's going to buy thier crappy stuff, look what happen to us.
|
China is the new kid on the block, and being new wants to make it's mark. Power, the most intoxicating of all mans desires drives this bull, and the bears can only look on.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.