Sailor Steve |
10-30-11 02:00 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMattJ.
(Post 1776778)
Well, the iowa couldve most certainly held her own in a 1 on 1. Had we not utilized radar guided FCS systems, the battle wouldve most likely have gone to yamato. Her 18.1 inch batteries and thick armor would be the obstacles to overcome. But, under even circumstance, the iowa couldve simply outgunned the Yamato from afar, using her superior top speeds and more accurate shots to pound at her from beyond the accurate range of Yamatos guns.
|
It's an old truism in warship design that you can't know the actual power of the enemy's guns, so you can only armor against your own. Iowa was armored against her own 16" guns, and Yamato was armored against her own 18" guns, and in both cases that armor was only good at long ranges. Close in there is no armor that can stop any decent shell of comparable value. The good news is that the 18" guns may have carried more powder but actually had slightly inferior penetration.
As for "outgunning from afar", that is by no means guaranteed. Unfortunately superior fire control has never been proven superior. The longest shot ever achieved against a moving target was roughly 26,000 yards, and that was more luck than skill. More likely no one would have been hitting until around 20,000 yards, and at that range Yamato's fire control was perfectly adequate. I agree, an Iowa could likely have "held her own", but the outcome was hardly certain, and that certainty is needed in any naval conflict.
|