![]() |
I cut my hair.
Hey, it's a start! |
Quote:
But hey, we agree on the first few, that's a start! |
The estate tax was created way back when to prevent the rise of a landed gentry. The founding fathers had just left a country where the system was set up "only to raise the wealth and importance of particular families and individuals, giving them an unequal and undue influence in a republic" according to North Carolina's 1784 law that abolished entailed estates. A similar law in Virginia in 1776 said that "the perpetuation of property in certain families, by means of gifts made to them in fee taille, is contrary to good policy." The idea of an estate tax was advocated by folks like Thomas Paine, Adam Smith (the father of capitalism, lest you call me a damn dirty socialist) and Thomas Jefferson. It revolves around the idea that your place in society should be earned by your own works and contributions to it, rather than by your last name.
I think it makes sense. |
I never understood the concept of an inheritance of money. I want my father to die in the process of spending his last dollar on himself. He earned it, I didn't. :yeah:
Inheriting houses, businesses, cars, etc, I can understand, but expecting to get money from someone and not pay taxes on it is unreasonable. An inheritance is just income without doing any work to earn it. Now I also think the inheritances should be taxed at the same rate as the inheritor's income tax. Having a separate and higher rate just for inheritances is wrong in my opinion. If my father leaves me any "free money" like an inheritance, I will be more than happy to pay an inheritance tax. I am not losing anything, just getting a little less money I did not earn. |
Cut everything that has been done in the past 3 and a half years.
Our debt will be under 1 trillion. |
First eliminate the Depts. of Education, and Energy. They are worse that useless. Greatly reduce the EPA. Thin out the Federal bureaucrats. No grants for loony tunes, democrat front groups. Quote:
Property is property. It was all earned, or purchased with earnings. Why should one be protected and the other not? It is, in fact, the accumulated earnings of a lifetime of labor. Quote:
|
Quote:
I'll add to your list:
|
Cutting funding for the arts is fine, but I take great exception to your labeling it as fluff, McBee. I would attempt to explain to you the great relevance that the arts are to society and history, but given your stated views on the matter it would be a futile endeavor.
Art is my business and it is my passion in life. It is not fluff. Somebody's stock just lost a lot of it's value in my book. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
TorpX and Nikimcbee...
What those 2 said. Every bit of it. But don't totally kill farm spending - actually go ahead. All of my neighbors are struggling farmers - they aren't getting anything. In fact, there was a recent study that showed people in my state are getting money under farm subsidies that in fact don't own farms. And drill baby drill. Get the gas prices down - it'll stimulate both new high performance (expensive) and used car sales. Bring back cars people can be proud to drive. |
I went home for lunch and caught a little bit of John Stossel's show "The money hole." (?)
He went around asking people (like Jay(Leno)-walking) whether or not certain grants were real gubmint grants or fake. (They were all real:stare::doh:) Such as a program to pay hookers to drink responsibly. So I'll add to my list: gubmint grants (see shimp on a treadmill, cowboy poetry) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.