| Skybird |
04-11-11 10:39 AM |
Displaying to all around you that you wish to look different at all cost from your new home's cultural standards and habits, surely is a strong hint for how much you desire to integrate yourself into your new hosting living place.
For the Islamisation movement, the Burkha and headscarfs simply are a political fightingtool to enforce more steps in retreat from the europeans - who are expected to adapt themselves to Islamic migrants, not that Islamic migrants in Europe have to adapt to European standards.
Muhammad himself demanded that women shall cover themselves. First the demand was just for toilet purposes, that women should not draw attention to themselves when exposing themselves on these occaisons, especially the attention of foreign infidel men. He later generalised the demand that women in principle should cover themselves. It was then when it became a tool of patriarchalic claiom for dominating women, and force them into a suppressed, obedient general attitude.
Wearing a Burkha in summer temperature, is a risk to health, causing cardiovasculare failure, and a statistically increased lethality and shortening of life expectancy of women.
The French are right to ban full veils, like the Germans are right to ban Swastikas in public display. Both are symbols for a totalitarian ideology, and both got and get used to support political ideologies that are incompatible with our laws and values.
But I do not want to be a flic in France these days. At best it means tremendous stress for them, due to the hysteric aggressiveness they most likely will meet from the woman herself when stopping a veiled women. At worst they will find themselves in physical fights and turmoils and getting injured when a whole local subgroups of well-integrated multicultural citizens with migration background go after them. I have had such scenes when I still worked in a shopping mall, and I know what the German police is telling about the situation in Muslim quarters of German metropoles. There are parts in Berlin where they do not go in at all without massive reinforcements. But even outside these quarters they more and more often meet physical violence and mobs of Muslim migrants when doiung their duty of whatever a kind - and the subject they deal with is a Muslim.
How comes they do not have such problems with migrants from other cultures? How comes that the biggest criminal family clans in Berlin, with hundreds of members, all are from Lebanon and Afghanistan and smaller ones also from Turkey and Albania - and the police usually avoiding to coinfront them withiout having called in hundreds of reinforcements? And the left-leaning jurisdication in Berlin trying to appease them and not confronting them, and hiding from the public that they are overrepresented in crime statistics in the city? At the sdame time the leaer of the German federal police union having demanded just days ago that finally the nationality and origin of criminal offenders must become part of warrants again and must be in cluded in the usual office paperload and office files again? Doing so was forbidden several years ago, to make it impossible for the casual observer to see in numbers black on white to what degree violence and crime in the metropoles of Germany is dominated by clans with a Muslim migration background.
It should be racism and discrimination to correctly identify criminal offenders...?
|
