![]() |
Quote:
Room is not really a problem. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For the west there is always the mountain states. Far less crowded, but you'll get a fair bit of winter north of New Mexico (and a decent amount in northern NM). Also way cheaper. |
Having lived for a short time in Monterey (Ft Ord) I have to say California is beautiful but I would never want to live there. Too expensive and the population is too nutty for my tastes.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*cough* s'cuse me... had a spastic moment there. The thing is, i remember how southern california used to be. And i see how it is now. I have a point of comparison, and i don't like the changes. Quote:
|
Quote:
As to NM, well, I'm sure you remember some of what we spoke about a few months ago, regarding your home "mountain," so believe me, the Missus and I have spoken more than once about living there or in Santa Fe; that said, her work is - likely in the next two-three months - taking her to LA. Without going into to much verboten detail, suffice it to say that it involves Hollyweird, so living in NM would be a bit of a hellacious commute. Quote:
|
Quote:
If you want to live an hour out of DC, I know of a house that might be going up for rent... LOL |
There is a lot of film making going on in NM over the last few years. A large studio here in ABQ, and shooting all over. I saw one of the Breaking Bad guys at the zoo a couple weekends ago (our kids were playing on the jungle gym).
But yeah, a bit of a commute (though my brother in law in CT spend more than the 1.5 hour flight from here to LA some days to get much less far on I-95 :) ) My observations are merely from a tourist POV. I like SD better than LA or Pasadena, that's for sure. I just like SF more. To live it would be hard, though. I doubt I could find a place I'd consider "acceptable" in SF for under several million bucks, and since we don;t have several million bucks for a house... :) If money were no object, I'd like SF best, put it that way. In the real world, I'm all for the flyover states, as long as they have mountains. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You might enjoy's these pictures i spliced together. The trailhead is about 30-45 minutes from where i live. http://www.ducimus.net/one.jpg http://www.ducimus.net/two.jpg Lovely panoramic views of smog, eh? lol EDIT: I should note, that even hiking, is no escape from the congestion here. In order to even get a place to park your damn car, you have to get up and be at the trailhead before first light, or you might not get a parking spot. It shouldn't be that way, but it is. Oh, and forget about seclusion either, you won't find much of that on the trail, at least not the local ones. EDIT 2: Here's the F'ing trailhead parking lot. Welcome to F'ing, disneyland, even in the great outdoors. http://www.ducimus.net/trailhead.jpg |
Our trailheads with parking lots also get crowded sometimes. Course that's for the Sandias. Father afield from the city it's pretty empty.
|
I hear you, Duc, but consider this: Out here, we can have the smog, without any other redeeming qualities. It's all a case of greener on the other side of the fence.
Seclusion isn't so much an issue for me; I've already mostly given up on that, especially if the wife's work does what it looks like its about to. So if I can't have seclusion, I surehell don't want it here. |
I grew up in CT, so I think there is a false sense of seclusion in places due to forests, etc. In the West, you are either secluded or you aren't. I am not really, since I can see houses out the windows, but it's at ;east spread out from me.
|
Quote:
Would that be the pre 1991 Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRJ) or post 1991 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (ZRJ), renamed Serbia after Milosević. Because SFRJ was big, seven billion people could live there but denser than Bangladesh :DL |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.