You know what this means now, right? This is now an Obama thread, and as such is topic spam. This thread must now be merged with the master Obama thread.

Trololol. :arrgh!:

Can't the United States just stay out of this. If the UN wants to go in, let some other member states (Arab) go in, then it won't be a "crusade" of evil West against Islam.

Just because there is some shootin to do, does not mean that the US has to be involved. :yep:

This leaves the door open...

Grab the oil.


Its not our problem so stay out.

BTW: Mr Cameron my PM what the hell do you think your doing?

I hate basketball so give me a F-22 and I'll do it... :03:

Yeah, where are the other Arab States? What would happen if a Persian state intervenes (sp)?:06:

They'll have to talk to TLAM strike and his F-22.

If you substitute United States with western states, these are exactly my thoughts. There is a reason that the Arab League demands that the West should intervene. If something goes wrong - and something always goes wrong, we know that there is not something like warfare without civilian casualties - then the infidels take the blame for bombing civs.
The Arab states have the military resources to do this on their own. Supporting them with logistic/financial aid: fine - landing western troops/using western air forces to strike: deeply dangerous.

What's wrong with their MiGs? They're a lot cheaper.

That and they will not get any pizza that hasn't been smothered in anchovy paste and left under the heating coils for five hours. :D

How about the IAF? They could clean the mess up in 10 minutes.

I'm too lazy to learn to read Russian. Plus I hate Soviet style RWR displays. :O:

Qaddafi would love that. See Scud Attacks in 1991. ;)

Unfortunately, they say "Arabs" instead of "Persians." When I sing along to that in my car, I make the correction.

Meh, they look much the same though an AAQ-14... :03: