![]() |
Infantry = Germany
Armor = Russia Air = USA Navy = USA Logistics = USA Artillery = USA Command = Germany |
Country: The Empire of Wotsitstan
Infantry = Germany Armor = Germany Air = Britain Navy = Britain Logistics = USA Artillery = Russian Command = Germany |
Erm, let's see.
Country: Hanseatic League of Northern Bigfootia Infantry - German 43/44 (Panzergrenadiers?) Armour - Soviet 44/45 Air - US 44/45 (If I could break it down I'll probably say Strategic Air - US 44/45 and Tactical Air - Soviet 44/45, though in the latter category I'm not absolutely decided as to who had it better) Navy - US 44/45 Logistics - US 44/45 Artillery - Soviet 44/45 Command - Prussia 1866...Well, okay, Soviet 44/45 (You're all really taking the German Command? Are you forgetting how messed up it was?) And if you'll allow me to add: Tactical Command and Training - Germany 42/43 Operational Doctrine - Soviet 44/45 |
Nation: Zod
National Anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKofKCziiG4 Infantry: German Motorized Infantry Armour: German Panzers, Assault Guns and Tank Destroyers Artillery: Soviet 1944/45 Air: RAF Navy: RN Logistics: US 1944/45 Command: General Patton HunterICX |
Quote:
Back in 1941, which kind of made sense since that is when Germany started to slide downhill. It is a well-known fact that had Hitler not intervened so much on the ground and let his Generals and Commanders dictate the battles more directly, then Germany could have, and imo would have done much much better. Prime example: the drive on Moscow. Germany had excellent Military Commanders, Rommel, Heinz Guderian, and Erich von Manstein come to mind. |
Nation: Takistan
Infantry-British (totally underrated in my view) Armor-German Air Force-USA Navy-USA Artillery-USSR Command Model-German Logistics-USA |
Quote:
Granted, Hitler is largely responsible for all this, but unless this is about the highly theoretical German Command structure as it was supposed to work, you can't take the German Command and ignore its vast problems. |
Quote:
Everyone wanted to prove to him that they were the best. Everyone wanted to outdo each other to be his 'favourite'. Everyone wanted to avoid failure. For fear of failure was big. Ultimately because of this, decisions were made hastily, often not being consulted at the low levels of command, on the ground in most cases with the ground commanders. But i get your point. :salute: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:yeah: |
You guys would actually take the British navy over the US Navy? I would think our fleet carriers alone would make the US the obvious choice in that area.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus the Spit/SeaSpit could whoop the Zeros @$$. The Firefly was also a great multipurpose carrier fighter. A/A, A/G, Recon, ASW. |
Quote:
. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.