SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Rangel: Not corrupt, just irresponsible (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=177198)

Takeda Shingen 11-18-10 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1537928)
But as long as the people vote for the little "R" and "D"s little will change. And that makes me feel sad for my country.

If I were to put my political philosophy into a concise package, that would just about cover it. :up:

the_tyrant 11-18-10 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1537928)
I think it is terrible the way Congress pushes this under the covers.

I can not understand any rational for not expelling him from office :nope:

And yet, we still keep re-electing these people into office. :nope:

What does that say about the average American voter? <and keep it clean>

I guess I am more bothered by the accepting attitude of

1. They all do it
2. The "other" side does it

Nether should be acceptable. :nope:

But as long as the people vote for the little "R" and "D"s little will change. And that makes me feel sad for my country.

If you really want change, join your local communist party, get an ak47, and wait for the general workers revolution against the corrupt capitalists

failing at that, just be satisfied with what you have already
many people around the world already envy the US's democratic principles

Takeda Shingen 11-18-10 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_tyrant (Post 1537945)
If you really want change, join your local communist party, get an ak47, and wait for the general workers revolution against the corrupt capitalists

failing at that, just be satisfied with what you have already
many people around the world already envy the US's democratic principles

Many loved Rome's democratic principles as well, but it was still weakened to the point of death by it's politicians.

Soundman 11-18-10 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1537928)
I think it is terrible the way Congress pushes this under the covers.

I can not understand any rational for not expelling him from office :nope:

And yet, we still keep re-electing these people into office. :nope:

What does that say about the average American voter? <and keep it clean>

I guess I am more bothered by the accepting attitude of

1. They all do it
2. The "other" side does it

Nether should be acceptable. :nope:

But as long as the people vote for the little "R" and "D"s little will change. And that makes me feel sad for my country.

AMEN! From the results of the recent election, it would appear the country is becoming fed up, pissed off and waking up to the fact that major changes need to happen. What this says however is, it is obvious we have a long way to go and far too many are still sleeping. Wake up and smell the coffee folks! tHow could this guy be re-elected, let alone those who would give this guy a free pass and a slap on the wrist, still hold office. Like AVG said, he should have been tried just like anyone else would be, pay any fines, and probably go to jail. On top of that, the guy has the nerve to declare "I can't afford a lawyer" ... How about selling some of that property you didn't pay taxes on to pay for your lawyer. Give me a huge freak'n break.. I say THROW THE BUMS OUT!

nikimcbee 11-18-10 08:34 PM

Duke needs to ask for a retrial after this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Cunningham

Soundman 11-18-10 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee (Post 1538049)
Duke needs to ask for a retrial after this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Cunningham

Isn't that somthing? Good read and juxtaposition! So much for Charlie's plea for leaniency due to his military service eh? :03::D Of course it may also lead a person to ponder... Does party affiliation have anything to do with the outcomes? :hmmm:

August 11-18-10 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1537928)
I can not understand any rational for not expelling him from office :nope:

I'm no fan of Rangel (or Cunningham) but I prefer it to be extremely difficult to expel a person that the voters have elected to public office.

It's similar to a proposal that was recently defeated at our last town meeting which would have banned felons from running for town selectmen. Now it's highly unlikely that i'd vote for a person with a criminal record but I don't like the idea that my fellow citizens and I aren't allowed to elect anyone we want.

nikimcbee 11-18-10 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August (Post 1538083)
I'm no fan of Rangel (or Cunningham) but I prefer it to be extremely difficult to expel a person that the voters have elected to public office.

It's similar to a proposal that was recently defeated at our last town meeting which would have banned felons from running for town selectmen. Now it's highly unlikely that i'd vote for a person with a criminal record but I don't like the idea that my fellow citizens and I aren't allowed to elect anyone we want.

What about finish elected time then go to prison?

Platapus 11-18-10 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August (Post 1538083)
I'm no fan of Rangel (or Cunningham) but I prefer it to be extremely difficult to expel a person that the voters have elected to public office.

How about impeach?

August 11-18-10 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee (Post 1538091)
What about finish elected time then go to prison?

Oh no you misunderstand Nik.

If whatever the scoundrel did rates a jail term I say the sentence should take effect immediately. Let a replacement be appointed or elected in special election according to state law like it would for a death in office or any other job incapacitating reason.

But I have a problem with government overturning the will of the voter for lesser reasons. Afaik Rangel didn't do anything that actually rates sending him to jail so while he probably ought to be the subject of a state impeachment effort, that should be for the voters of New Yorks 15th congressional district to make that call.

Imo of course.

August 11-18-10 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1538115)
How about impeach?

You mean like Clinton?

nikimcbee 11-18-10 10:06 PM

I thought the tax thingy is a problem? That's why I like your signature.:D:salute:

August 11-18-10 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee (Post 1538155)
I thought the tax thingy is a problem?

Could be I guess but so far he hasn't been convicted of tax evasion in a court of law or sentenced to a jail term by a judge.

Quote:

That's why I like your signature.:D:salute:
Thanks! :up: I applied it earlier this month right down to town selectmen. Didn't do too much good here in Democratachusetts but i'll keep plugging and maybe someday pluralism will again be seen here in the nations Cradle of Liberty.

tater 11-18-10 10:20 PM

August is spot on, IMO.

It is the State/constituency that has the final say on booting them. The party, OTOH, can and should be judged on their reaction. For minor infractions (this is major, IMO), they should boot them from committee or party leadership spots if they want the party to look clean. For stuff like this, they should boot him from the party. Failure to do so is an endorsement of his crimes.

CaptainHaplo 11-19-10 01:41 AM

Censure was the most they could do without expulsion - which given that Mr. Rangel was just re-elected, should not occur. His constituents, regardless of his legal issues, decided to send him back to Washington. To expel him would be to ignore their choice.

Censure will assure that he is relegated to a minor role - his seniority is not technically stripped, but by tradition the party (either one) tends to shun a censured membor.

Now should there be a legal prosecution? Thats up to a Federal or NY DA I would think.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.