![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
failing at that, just be satisfied with what you have already many people around the world already envy the US's democratic principles |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Duke needs to ask for a retrial after this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Cunningham |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's similar to a proposal that was recently defeated at our last town meeting which would have banned felons from running for town selectmen. Now it's highly unlikely that i'd vote for a person with a criminal record but I don't like the idea that my fellow citizens and I aren't allowed to elect anyone we want. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If whatever the scoundrel did rates a jail term I say the sentence should take effect immediately. Let a replacement be appointed or elected in special election according to state law like it would for a death in office or any other job incapacitating reason. But I have a problem with government overturning the will of the voter for lesser reasons. Afaik Rangel didn't do anything that actually rates sending him to jail so while he probably ought to be the subject of a state impeachment effort, that should be for the voters of New Yorks 15th congressional district to make that call. Imo of course. |
Quote:
|
I thought the tax thingy is a problem? That's why I like your signature.:D:salute:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
August is spot on, IMO.
It is the State/constituency that has the final say on booting them. The party, OTOH, can and should be judged on their reaction. For minor infractions (this is major, IMO), they should boot them from committee or party leadership spots if they want the party to look clean. For stuff like this, they should boot him from the party. Failure to do so is an endorsement of his crimes. |
Censure was the most they could do without expulsion - which given that Mr. Rangel was just re-elected, should not occur. His constituents, regardless of his legal issues, decided to send him back to Washington. To expel him would be to ignore their choice.
Censure will assure that he is relegated to a minor role - his seniority is not technically stripped, but by tradition the party (either one) tends to shun a censured membor. Now should there be a legal prosecution? Thats up to a Federal or NY DA I would think. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.