SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Made in China (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=173247)

TLAM Strike 08-06-10 08:15 PM

Dong Thong...
Quote:

Originally Posted by frau kaleun (Post 1461875)
That was the only thing I understood! :wah:

^This is why women make bad scientists and engineers. :03:
How can you expect to be respected in the world if you don't know about the terminal ballistics of frequency hopping inverse modular axial interference field emitters and their relation to a electromagnetic focus compensator matrix.
:O:

Quote:

It's a banana hammock that gives you a wedgie, amirite?
Its a banana hammock worn the wrong way around. :D

frau kaleun 08-06-10 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1461886)
How can you expect to be respected in the world if you don't know about the terminal ballistics of frequency hopping inverse modular axial interference field emitters and their relation to a electromagnetic focus compensator matrix

:hmmm:

I'm on a horse.




Furthermore, I think Carthage must be destroyed.

AVGWarhawk 08-06-10 08:39 PM

Well the article said it was accurate up to 900 miles. Keep the carrier at 901 miles from the launch site. :03:

UnderseaLcpl 08-07-10 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1461867)

Possible, very possible in fact.

Playing the PRC side here, there are a few possible counter measures. Big olde Numuro Uno in my book is home on jam. Only nuc surface ships in the USN are Carriers. If the carrier is the one jamming and the attacking weapon has HOJ capability its kind of self defeating. If its the CG and DDGs jamming those get taken out and the next wave of Dong Thongs kills the carrier.

Then we simply tow smaller deployable arrays behind the escorts on the outside of the formation! We could put one behind the carrier, too. Jeez, do I have to think of everything?:O: Granted, we'd lose effective radiated power to some degree with that setup, and the smaller engines* on the escorts would cost us wattage, but it should still be enough to light up the Ding Dong's scope (which I presume would have a comparitively small power supply, being as how it's on a missile and all).

*I thought we had CGNs, at least. Did something happen to those?

Oberon 08-07-10 03:33 AM

Did someone say Kong?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_z2d4IxltHJ...VAHALLA_01.jpg

Gerald 08-07-10 05:34 AM

Chinese 'Carrier-Killer' Missile Could Reshape,
 
Sea Combat.The Dong Feng 21A and launcher vehicle are displayed at the Beijing Military Museum. China is reportedly working on developing the world's first antiship ballistic missile based on a similar design.

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/...r-expert-says/

Platapus 08-07-10 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1461375)
AEGIS could take out four or five but one or two would still get through and from the angle of approach they would screw the flight deck if they hit, thus putting the carrier out of useful action.

Not an all powerful weapon, but still an interesting approach to the problem of circumnavigating CVBG defences.

Even if the ASBM is equipped with the smallest warhead, 100Kt will do more than screw up a flight deck.

Remember, what 15 Kt did to Hiroshima.

This is something to be concerned with. But like any other weapon system, it can be mitigated... given time, money, and focus.

TLAM Strike 08-07-10 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl (Post 1461970)
Then we simply tow smaller deployable arrays behind the escorts on the outside of the formation! We could put one behind the carrier, too. Jeez, do I have to think of everything?:O: Granted, we'd lose effective radiated power to some degree with that setup, and the smaller engines* on the escorts would cost us wattage, but it should still be enough to light up the Ding Dong's scope (which I presume would have a comparitively small power supply, being as how it's on a missile and all).

*I thought we had CGNs, at least. Did something happen to those?

Still... Home on Jamming. ;)
Just adjust forward of where the jamming is coming from if its less powerful than normal.

Also I just realized that the warhead needs to be guided by radar but the bomblets it drops do not. They could be designed to slow down and maneuver with air vanes and by guided by IR. The US has a weapon like that for taking out armor. :hmmm:

All the CGNs were broken up for scrap in the late 90s early 00s.

Skybird 08-07-10 09:07 AM

Made in China? I am the proud owner of a Fenix P3D. Marvellous piece of equipment, ultrabright, and of highest manufacturing quality - beats most competing models in its class easily and hands down. But costs just a fraction of comparing items from western production. I love it! :O:

Oberon 08-07-10 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 1462120)
Made in China? I am the proud owner of a Fenix P3D. Marvellous piece of equipment, ultrabright, and of highest manufacturing quality - beats most competing models in its class easily and hands down. But costs just a fraction of comparing items from western production. I love it! :O:

:doh: Communist spy!


Burn him!! :nope:

Gerald 08-07-10 09:30 AM

Like the witches,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1462132)
:doh: Communist spy!


Burn him!! :nope:

did in the Middle Ages :roll:

Oberon 08-07-10 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendor (Post 1462140)
did in the Middle Ages :roll:

Well, you didn't do a very good job, he's still here!

Wait...

He's a Communist witch?! :doh:

Catfish 08-07-10 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1462147)
He's a Communist witch?! :doh:

Believing all witches should fly the same broom - :O:

TLAM Strike 08-07-10 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Catfish (Post 1462151)
Believing all witches should fly the same broom - :O:

and that they should not use witchcraft for personal gain only for the benefit of the state and party. :DL

Skybird 08-07-10 10:22 AM

:o
.
.
.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.