![]() |
Quote from last page under "Overall Opinions and Recommendations"
"...Boy, is this a hard game to not recommend..." Boy is this is not hard to NOT recommend "...Once players can get past these issues, there is a potential for a lot of fun with this game..." Of course once the game gets properly finished, once the online idiocricy gets dropped and all large collection of bugs for one unfinished game gets solved, it would become a game. The question is would it become a game or just a demo that only some with a stable internent connection can play. So your as score for the review 1 out of 5, is preferably to warn protential buyers of a unfinished game rather than say we hope one day all the crap gets solved. "...There are already some mods released that will correct some of the deficiencies in the game, but the fact that the second patch — the one that is supposed to correct many of these problems — is delayed once again means players that bought the game in good faith are still waiting for fixes that shouldn’t have been in the gold release..." Is the same to say offer your "butt" and pray for "someone" to have vaseline or spare you from considerable pain... that isn't hope but fait. But the church of Sh3, Sh4 have revealed that they go deep on the but without vaseline leaving unfinished business. So you might have hope, good faith but in the end you were raped and still glad to be victims. "...The game play is good..." How come the play is any good when AI is more stupid than a snail? If you are happy wasting your money on buying a cripped half backed game then keep it to you otherwise you sound fool of your self. Review of the Review done! fool out! |
Figures, there always has to be one guy that thinks I wasn't rough enough on the game.
Now I know how the Principal felt when he had to sit there and listen to Billy Madison's explanation of the Industrial Revolution. |
Quote:
I wouldn't let it worry you, I for one thought it was a good review:up: |
Quote:
|
atleast his views of online DRM are the same as mine, look at the second link!
|
Quote:
It's pathetic really, and you must question whether or not some of these 'critics' even have the game. |
Quote:
Quote:
If they didn't, we would certainly have less immature rants. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sadly, some people lack those qualities (sometimes). |
I actually liked the review a lot (I don't have the game, so I can gauge how informative it was) but its certainly a bit contradictory in the conclussions. Thyro has a point here: After reading the article I was suprised by the ending "It is hard not to recommend it". I don't know if your emphasis on the bugs during the review gave the false impression that there were some non-negotiable deal breakers, or if it was the emphasis on the final conclussions what actually gave the false impression that you liked the game. But there is certainly a bit of lack of synchronization. Other than that, I want to repeat again that it was IMHO a fair and objective review. Coing from an airdale ;), it is a refreshing thing for those of us who are may be too focused an no longer impartial. :up:
|
mebbe he had a good reason to say SOMETHING good about the game.
like, mebbe his boss told hoim to do so? and like, mebbe his boss got a new ferrari enzo if the review wasnt totally negative? mebbe? whonows... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fanaticism exists on both sides of the issue, unfortunately. :yep: |
Quote:
JCC |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.