yes, the huge totals is to make the game more appealing to casual gamers. It was the same with the stock campaign in SH3 and SH4. You run across way more ships than you would in real life.

In real life, a typical U-boat commander would be out on patrol for an average of 60-80 days and sink an average of 2 ships. Realistic yes, but the average gamer will find that as interesting as watching paint dry.

Of course, that is not just a Silent Hunter problem, many sims, including IL-2 and Falcon 4 ramp up the action to make it more palatable to casual gamers. That has been well known for a long time.

Even among us, how many (other than Dowly) use HI TC to skip over the boring part and get straight to the action?

That is part of the reason why I always wait until modders get around to producing a more realistic campaign before I start a real one. :ping:

So when du you people think there will be a realistic campaign mod? First RuB hopefully?

This is totally the case with the stock game. But thankfully there's enough sim and advanced features and scripting under the hood that we'll be able to mod it into the sim it should be. :)

Before release The Devs wrote that in the Campaign, once you sink a particular ship, you wouldn't see it again, 'just like real life' they said, while holding up SH5 like it was the benchmark for realism. How many Dido class have you gotta sink?! How many Dido existed in The Big One?!:nope:

16? But yeah, ships respawn, but perhaps they weren't supposed to?

In every user folder, there is a CampaignProgress.cfg which has some entries related to unique ships:

If you somehow named all the Dido classes and made appropriate modifications to the campaign files, what you're asking could be done.
I don't know how the game mechanic works with the values above, though I've read people sinking multiples of a supposedly unique ship... So the question that if this works is still there :hmmm:

Further to the earlier answer about Murmansk. I hate to cheat but thought I would mention this just in case someone is stuck. Go to Murmansk and there is a convoy riding at anchor. Destroy this lot then save your game, then load again and they are all back there waiting for you....Must be a bug

I recommend this light campaign mod: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/down...o=file&id=1591

It lowers the requirements for objectives, so it'll take less time to complete all of them.

Hopefully. :DL

I can't even imagine running the entire game in 1x TC, my electric bill would be huge! Not to mention my eventual loss of (remaining) sanity.

Even though I don't go to that extreme, I still play at a low TC, say max 32x or 64x, stopping every hour or two, just to look around, appreciate the scenery, look for targets.

One of the improvements in the game is to the environment, the sea, weather, landscape. I can easily waste 10 minutes just looking at the storm tossed ocean.

Sheeet, every single time I bump the T.C. up to ANYTHING above 1050, I get ran into by some ship my watch crew missed steaming on a collision course with us. So far, I have died four or five times, all but once has been because of ramming by some ship or another. :nope:

Yeah it annoyed me in Il-2 as well how every mission you'd bag a half dozen bogies. I read someone from some experten that they would average 3 or 4 sorties just to run into something to shoot. I know the DCG gave a lot of sightseeing missions where you might run into something or might not and transit ones for added realism to mix it up a bit.

And yeah ,I do like TC, would never finish a game otherwise!;) Though of course I still would prefer a realistic rewarding hunt for a merchant or two with a rare opportunity for more or a determined dogfight where I'd be happy with just one kill and surviving to give examples, rather than the bag 10 planes or 20 ships per flight/voyage we get in sims as stock. For me it's not 100% realism in operating the equipment that is important( I don't have the time or patience as when younger to learn Falcon 4.0 or Lock On inside and out at 100% realism), but the overall FEEL of the campaigns. I'd like to get an idea of the danger and fear and difficulty of success in combat, and not worry about memorising fuel mixes or 100 key commands. This lack of interest in the fanatical detail that I have these days is also due to the crappy manuals we get with games. You can't fly and have a manual open to learn and practice detailed things as you could with the beautiful Falcon 4.0 ring bound edition I have.

I sank HMS Rodney and the Queen Elizabeth in Scapa Flow. 2 weeks later they re-appeared. :o

This sort of gamey campaign is a show stopper to me. I generally prefer the realistic campaigns of GWX or OM. Makes hunting the rare prey much more exciting and rewarding. I'd rather RTB without even having spotted an enemy ship after a low TC patrol than with some 20 kills. But I figure that this makes me a minority even among us sub skippers, let alone the casual players. In fact, the lack of a decent campaign in SH5 and the great alternatives in SH3 and SH4 is the only issue remaining that keeps me from actually playing SH5 even after so many great mods have been released that solved most of the other issues. That being said, I have to add that I am on disability and therefore have plenty of time to spare. I may think differently about it after coming home from a hard working day.