![]() |
Quote:
|
Yes that happens. But that could be more a graphic card problem
than screen. A screen that can display x * y resolution can usually do so at various frequencies with absolutely no change in resolution, because it's just a matter of refresh frequency and available bandwith on the link between the graphic card, and screen. If you have to lower resolution as frequency of refresh goes up, it is because of the graphic card, and its RAMDAC frequency. Here are my settings : Resolution : 1280 x 1024 In game : 1280 x 1024 (using patch for XP) Anisotropic filtering : 16x Antialiasing - Gamma correction : On Antialiasing - Mode : Override any application setting Antialiasing - Setting : 16xQ Antialiasing - Transparency : Off Maximum pre-rendered frames : 3 Multi-display/mixed-GPU acceleration : Single display Texture filtering - Anisotropic sample optimization : Off Texture filtering - Negative LOD bias : Clamp Texture filtering - Quality : High Quality Texture filtering - Trilinear optimization : On Threaded optimization : Auto Triple buffering : Off Vertical sync : Force off Drivers : 196.21 Card : Club 3D Geforce 9800GTX+ Direct X upgraded using DirectXX 11 installer (installs a more recent DirectX 9 version than 9.0c installer) I took a few screenshots. I don't see many jaggies on screen, sometimes it does happen but only at some very high angles of sea but not always (so it might be a rendering bug). FPS is around 40 to 50/60 in harbors Outside it's between 100-120 all the time And it goes down to 50-60 when I am seeing a ship explode and there are many explosions (this is the most sensible loss of FPS I can see, when ships explodes and balls of flames rise up in the air). Note : in my screenshots, artefacts appear. They don't in the game which looks fine. Particules appear fine with water, but never on screenshots (the screenshot saves the picture from the game to disk before some graphic stuff is added to the picture like particule rendering and transparency settings and various stuff). I should try to do screenshots using a real tool and not the integrated game one. I got Fraps but it makes the game crash when I try to use it (got the latest version, licensed). http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/9...1268910885.jpg http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/2...1268910862.jpg http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/958/shot1268910857.jpg http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/8...1268910844.jpg http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7...1268910836.jpg |
Good luck, and happy SH3ing, with the new machine.
|
Corrections
If you have Gammacorrection " On"
the sun will look terrible , the sun halo is not there , the sun look like a golfball :nope: Turn gammacorrection off , and you have a beautyful shining sun:yeah: |
Quote:
|
Well, I got SHIII running last night (did a download from Direct2Drive) and it installed under Windows 7 with no problem.
However, my LCD backlight has died! Steve |
Quote:
Thanks. |
Quote:
|
Computer gurus please advise
I went to my local computer store today. This is what they want to sell me. I want it to be able to play SH3 mit GWX3 and SH5, if the Ubis ever remove the friggin DRM.
Will this work? :hmmm: Processor Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 Memory Kingston 2GB DDR2-800 (I presume this is RAM) Hard drive W.Digital 500 GB Sata2 Video PCIE HD4350 1024mb DDR2 ONE-931 Core 2 Duo/2GB/500/ DVDRW Windows 7 Home Basic |
How much do they want for the system?
I'd check out www.cyberpowerpc.com. I started with their $799 barebones system. I got the entire system for less than I could buy the components for from Newegg. Steve |
Quote:
#1 - No Less than 4GB of RAM (I'd actually recommend 6 or 8GBs) #2 - Lose the Core2Duo. It's an outdated and old chip and unless you're getting it for a song and dance, nix it. Minimum, go with a Core2Quad but better yet, spend the extra few bucks for an i5 or i7. Personnally, I'd recommend an AMD Athlon II Quad-Core or a Phenom II Quad-Core. Lot more "bang-for-the-buck" out of AMD imho. #3 - Lose the Home Basic. Go with Home Premuim 64bit (so you can utilize 4+ GBs of RAM). It's only a couple of bucks to upgrade, and the lack of headaches will make it absolutely worth it. #4 - Depending on what they're charging you for the video card, a 4350 could be a good deal or a complete rip off. It's an older card that will perform nicely on SH3 but might struggle a bit with SH5. Again, I'd recommend minimum a 4550/4570 here with 512MB of GDDR2 (or GDDR3) to get the most longetivity out of your purchase and it won't cost you alot more than a 43xx series. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.