SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter 5 (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=244)
-   -   Sad times if you're a sub simmer (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=164378)

Bilge_Rat 03-11-10 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbografx (Post 1308372)
Call Norm Koger at Storm Eagle Studios. Or the guys at Eagle Dynamics.

Mmm, mmm, Fidelity!

no market for sub sims, if there was, other companies would be producing them.

Sonalyst produced very realistic sub sims, "Sub Command" and "Dangerous Waters", no one bought them.




TDK1044, thank you for the post, had a good laugh over that one..:rotfl2::rotfl2::har::har:

Jeevz 03-11-10 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by himlaviz (Post 1308333)
Choose your game. Choose arcade . . . But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose arcade: I chose something else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got simulation?

:har: Brilliant!

Try to stay out of the Worst Toilet in Deutschland when you're back from patrol.

himlaviz 03-11-10 09:36 AM

I see SH5 as a long time investment, I hope for some patch to get the core game (as designed) to get fixed and bit polished by the devs and hope for a mod like GWX/NYGM to take SH5 even further when it comes to historical and realistic aspect of the game where the devs can't dig as deep due to a timescheduale and limited resources.

Sure maybe the patches wont fix the game, maybe there is no more patches (but I don't think so), either way I have lost $75 (d2d US site + VAT) for far less return value back on other happenings/things/stuff then what I already have had with Silent Hunter 5.

For the time being I am enjoying the stuff that works and learn how to play the game as it's designed and not SH3 v2.0.

Also have an idea for a mod for more interaction with the crew to talk to them for feedback of things that I feel is missing, like depth, do a full sweep, follow nearest contact and so on. Keep in the spirit of SH5 with interacting with the crew instead of or as a complement to key commands.

Like standing next to the sonar crewman and listen and asking him of updates while slowly trying to sneak away from a destroyer.

Iron Budokan 03-11-10 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 1308364)
I was playing last night(no mods) and started my second patrol. I gave some experience points to my hydrophone man. He now will listen for ships. Before he would just say, "I can not do that right now." So, yeah, working your crew does help.

He will now listen for ships.

*Sigh* :shifty:

Drifter 03-11-10 09:53 AM

SH5 is quickly becoming less and less arcadish. Check out my recent mod that removes all crew 'superpower' abilities. :|\\

http://174.123.69.202/~subsimc/radioroom/showthread.php?t=164391

Commie 03-11-10 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat (Post 1308396)
no market for sub sims, if there was, other companies would be producing them.

Sonalyst produced very realistic sub sims, "Sub Command" and "Dangerous Waters", no one bought them.


Sonalysts make military grade sims, so marketing for mass exposure isn't really their thing, just as with eSIM games and their Steel Beasts. What you don't realise is that these games didn't seem to threaten the existance of the company, so they weren't a wasted investment. They sold enough to cover costs and make a bit. This is what i'm talking about: Sonalysts and eSIM didn't have a big publisher to promote their wares. UBI CAN promote SH, so even a half finished SH can be sold off as the greatest thing since sliced bread because there's no room for anyone else at the moment. If UBI buggers off to the console market, you'll see a new WW2 sub sim come cautiously into the light within a year or two.

IanC 03-11-10 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Safe-Keeper (Post 1308337)
Ubisoft is a company as much as your local barbershop, and they have the right to cater to the group they want, be it hardcore sim fans or Modern Warfare kiddies with thirty second attention spans.

It's more like Ubisoft is the only barbershop in town, and he keeps giving me bad, half finished hair cuts. So bad, I have to go home and have my wife fix it a little.
I'm just about ready to tell that barber to kiss my arse.

JamesT73J 03-11-10 10:10 AM

There's something missing in the Esim / ED argument: Their consumer products are related to their contractor work. Esim don't tend to release vehicles for SB ProPE that nobody is using, because why invest time in something that is not going to benefit their military efforts? ED are the same; the tech is a continuation of their work.

Bohemia Interactive, anyone?

We won't see a u-boat sim from anyone else. UBI are presently the only game in town.

141st_Alper 03-11-10 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Commie (Post 1308388)
Eagle Dynamics (buggy as well) or 1C Maddox are my preferred choices, but they are busy with flight sims ATM.

Im not looking to positive for eagle dynamics. Yea they can handle a subsim. But un-moddable subsim. At least modding the Lock on Flaming cliffs is a torture chamber for modders. We just can change some 3d model files and textures. Thats all.(no script work, no custom cockpits etc etc..)

OakGroove 03-11-10 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Commie (Post 1308483)
Sonalysts make military grade sims, so marketing for mass exposure isn't really their thing, just as with eSIM games and their Steel Beasts. What you don't realise is that these games didn't seem to threaten the existance of the company, so they weren't a wasted investment. They sold enough to cover costs and make a bit. This is what i'm talking about: Sonalysts and eSIM didn't have a big publisher to promote their wares. UBI CAN promote SH, so even a half finished SH can be sold off as the greatest thing since sliced bread because there's no room for anyone else at the moment. If UBI buggers off to the console market, you'll see a new WW2 sub sim come cautiously into the light within a year or two.

:up:
This is what i´m hoping for. eSim Games and Bohemia Interactive didn't start out with military contracts, eventually their engines were evaluated and found fit for purpose as mil training tools.

Jeevz 03-11-10 12:07 PM

What military would be interested in a U-Boat or Fleet Boat training sim?

IanC 03-11-10 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeevz (Post 1308748)
What military would be interested in a U-Boat or Fleet Boat training sim?

You don't know about the time machine project? It's all about ending the war sooner and... I've said too much already. :shifty:

OakGroove 03-11-10 12:21 PM

We can exclude the USN showing interest in a WW2 submarine game, that goes without saying. That's not what i was about. It´s about opportunities opening up for smaller companies, that do not have 8 million USD to spent on just producing a game advert.

Weather-guesser 03-11-10 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie (Post 1308291)
Thanks for the cheery start to my day! :rotfl2:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_q8kKvvkY0K...8/s320/gun.jpg

You're too much! :har:

FIREWALL 03-11-10 12:37 PM

This game has been out only since March 2nd.

While not the biggest hit Worldwide as everyone thought it should or would be.

The best I can makeout on this website is about 50\50.

You either love it or hate it.

One thing that is disturbing is the posts that say " Ubisoft could just walkaway from this game. " is RIDICULOUS.





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.