My suggestion was because I oppose the death penalty.
Are you somehow saying that the outcome I suggested would not be fitting for this particular piece of scum?
If so can you explain why such a result would not be appropriate.

Unfortunately thats nearly always the case, until people calm down and look.
The problem with the claim that "there is absolutely no doubt" when it comes to capital punishment is that again and again that phrase turns round and bites them on the arse at a later date.

You got something there but I would venture to guess there would be some sort of protection with the other supremacists. There are groups, gangs, whatever you want to call them.

As he appears to be a violent criminal he should be considered a threat even to the general prison population, so I would suggest solitary....but as a cost cutting measure make it solitary where he has to share a cell.
Though of course you can't make him share his solitary cell with a white supremacist as that would be rewarding him by placing him in his little whites only paradise.

I just made a statement of fact.

I'll bet O.J. Simpson has already got into a gang. If he didn't, I think we already would have heard about his prison murder.

Heh. Humans are all primitive. Women like tall men. Why? Because tall men can see further to find prey for hunting in a hunting and gathering situation. In our modern world, we don't have to worry about food (well, most of us), and added height really is no longer as handy as it used to be. Yet women still like tall men. I guess it's the same deal w/vengeance.

It's not vengeance Torvald. I don't want to see him tortured, just made dead before he can infect others.

I always figured it was because shorter guys like me just didn't look as imposing. :p2:

For me being against death penalty is making NO exceptions. No matter what were the circumstances. What is more I wouldn't call him an animal-as far as I know even animals are not a cruel as humans. I would also not rely death penalty on the doubt of guilt or not. Tribesman: what you suggest is just cutting a hand for stealing, cutting the tongue for lying(this form of verb is probably wrong but u know what i mean). Simply it won't do. We would have to many invalids. Personally: the more cruel ways of punishing we make the more similar to "them" we become. The only difference is the so-called "law" that "allows" us to kill them and forbides them to kill us.

Let's take bloody revenge! :yeah:

At least that'S what this thread smells like.

:hmmm: Determination not only is something different than emotional arousal and rage. Determination even has the absence of emotional arousal as a precondition.

Obviously kranz you have never owned a cat. :)

yeah, actually I haven't but once I had my leg "raped" by a dog:wah:

August: you know, whenever I hear someone say "Well, killing a murderer won't bring back the victim(s)" I always counter with "please list all the murderers that killed again after being executed."

Appended to the above: when I say "murderer," I mean someone we know w/absolute certainty IS a murderer (like the guy who sparked this thread).

Btw, his execution date has been set for March 18th. He opted for, strangely enough, the electric chair!!! I guess we'll get some of our bloody vengeance, then, as that is almost certainly a really nasty way to go.

yeah that's well fcked up. But actually according to this latest issues with lethal injection there is no good method. We can only imagine what happens after the shot and so on but those who were opposing d.penalty raised the question of possible pain inflicted. For me it's just crazy that you are able to decide how you want to die...:nope: