It will probably have the same deterrent value as the death penalty, none.

Partypooper. :shifty:


Well, atleast it makes the police's job easier if they find DNA from the scene.

I do not believe it is being peddled as a deterrent.

Neither do I, was adressing Dowlys post.

Now don't be too hasty. I don't know of any criminal who ever committed a crime after suffering the death penalty...

Dowly has one good point, perps now might use gloves and chemicals to cover their DNA track. Some of these guys are damn smart.

True enough, yet the death penalty ha no effect on overall crime rates which warrant the death penalty.

True, most sit on death row for decades anyway. Read up on the Broomstick Killer who did his whacked out crimes in TX. I was a damn shame what happened to the young women after he was released in error. What good is the death penalty if the perp sits for decades?

Human piece of trash:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_McDuff
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Ramirez STILL WAITING ON DEATH ROW

Yes, where are all those hackers getting their data, since they have not been given access to it? Mysterious. And non-authorized cross-office exchange of personal data - why does it exist if law does not allow it?

This is food for very hard thought.

Or sorry - but is it really? Haven't we had enough data scandals on the past 12 months already?

Ah yes, it is illegal by law, that's why nobody will do it. :lol: Isn't this a happy and honest planet we live on.


Don't get me wrong, I absolutely see the ebenfit of datastoring DNY smaples for law enforcement, and in an ideal world I would not think a second on objecting to it. But this world is not honest, but bad. I also the see the risks - which you still seem to minimise although reality already has overtaken you.

Well, lets start with were and why your DNA got into a data base:hmmm: If it is not there then why worry?

For the same reason why fingerprints are kept in databases as well - to make them accessible for data processing - mass comparisons, for example. ;)


Security interests and freedom onterests need to be balanced against each other, you just can't have both maxed out. The more the slider moves toeards security, the more control there is, and the less freedom, the more freedom the slider indicates, the less control and the less control you get. - That'S what all these anti-terror laws we got in the past 9 years - try to hide from public discussion. But total security means total control and total loss of freedom and private sphere.

But you did not answer the question. How and where did your DNA get into the data base? I have not been anywhere were DNA was asked for. In law enforcement your DNA might end up in the data base as a result of a crime. Again, if your DNA is not in the data base why worry? I just do not see company X raiding my hair brush for a sample or getting taken to the ground only to find a cotton swab in my mouth for sample off my inner cheek.

Did you read the original article? The whole point of this discussion is the legislation they want to pass will let the police take samples without a warrant. This means they can just make you a suspect, collect the DNA and record it, nothing you can do about it. That's the part I object to.

I agree with Skybird as well. Once the data exists it is at risk of being stolen. It happens all the time. You can't tell me you don't see the stories about data comprimises. Add to that, the corporate risk. Eventually the corporations will use their influence to get the data legally. That scares me more than hackers do.

This is were we part agreement. For starters, the police will not be entering your home for a sample nor will they call you in. We also have to consider probably cause. The there is illegal search and seizure. If your in the pokie you ended up there for a reason. Wrong spot at the wrong time only flys so far. I do not see this DNA issue going above law enforcement usage only...warranted or not.

Bingo! That's the whole point. I consider it to be illegal search and seizure to collect my DNA without a court order signed by a judge before I've been charged with a felony. The legislation they are trying to pass will give them that right, before any charge is filed, without a court order. It's a violation of the 4th amendment.