SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter 5 (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=244)
-   -   Enlarge the community ? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=156195)

Brag 09-15-09 05:46 PM

To enlarge the community it will be necessary to change the name to:

Soupsim.com

nattydread 09-15-09 09:11 PM

Im not sure how appealing flights as a Condor, Ju88, B24, etc would be. I guess it would be lots of TC until a contact or vector is provided, then fly to the area, do a visual search, acquire the target and dive on it. Drop, climb up for a minute turn and drop again...then fly home. Yay!

I guess its not much different than what we do now...but atleast we get to engage the target for a substantial amount of time, and we can usually get more than two runs on it.

Escorts would be a lot of TCing also...but once again, when you engage the target, you get a substantial period of time in contact with the target.

THE_MASK 09-15-09 10:27 PM

If SH5 is great out of the box it will sell itself .

mookiemookie 09-15-09 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nattydread (Post 1172909)
Im not sure how appealing flights as a Condor, Ju88, B24, etc would be. I guess it would be lots of TC until a contact or vector is provided, then fly to the area, do a visual search, acquire the target and dive on it. Drop, climb up for a minute turn and drop again...then fly home. Yay!

I guess its not much different than what we do now...but atleast we get to engage the target for a substantial amount of time, and we can usually get more than two runs on it.

Escorts would be a lot of TCing also...but once again, when you engage the target, you get a substantial period of time in contact with the target.

Well, seeing as this is a picture of the air wing Goering detached for naval use:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2176/...b2302d.jpg?v=0

...that may not be the most historical of simulations. :03:

(yes, yes, I know I'm exaggerating. But not by much!)

nattydread 09-16-09 01:34 AM

I thought he occasionally dispatched a Condor or something...though that soon stopped after a while.

JU_88 09-16-09 04:11 AM

Goering mounted attacks on north sea shipping & arctic convoys - mostly with Ju88s / 87s, He111s & Condors.

The only thing I have ever read on air cover for U-boats was over Biscay.
After much pleading and begging from Donitz, Goering gave up a few JU88cs (heavy fighter version) to interecept ASW aircraft such as the Sunderland/Catalina/Hudson etc,
But when the Brits responded by sending Mosquitos & beaufighters the 88cs were Toast.
Goreing replaced the JU88cs with single seat FW 190s to cover Biscay, but they were state of the art fighters, in big demand - so they were eventatually reassigned elsewhere.

I believe ther ever increasing Ailled air cover (especially Escort carriers & M.A.Cs) put an end to the FW Condor as Maritime bomber, They never co-operated with U-boats anyway, they just did their own thing.

Was a simliar story for Coastal Command in Britain, until the lend lease Aircaft came though from the states, they mostly had to manage with a handful of Sunderlands and Bomber Commands outdated rejects.

nattydread 09-16-09 01:42 PM

Weither they cooperated with the subs or not, there was still an air component to the Naval war. Im not saying it would be very robust...but it could be an option for those who want to experience it...this is sort of the venue for it.

I just hope they get the flight model more believeable before they do it...the aircraft in SH4 sucked! It looked like they applied the sea gull flight model to the planes. I wasnt sure if they were trying to bomb me or catch bread crumbs one of my crew was throwing into the air.

JU_88 09-17-09 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nattydread (Post 1173322)
Weither they cooperated with the subs or not, there was still an air component to the Naval war. Im not saying it would be very robust...but it could be an option for those who want to experience it...this is sort of the venue for it.

I just hope they get the flight model more believeable before they do it...the aircraft in SH4 sucked! It looked like they applied the sea gull flight model to the planes. I wasnt sure if they were trying to bomb me or catch bread crumbs one of my crew was throwing into the air.

I agree Aircraft have not been done justice in SH 3 & 4
people forget that Aircaft were responsible for almost half of all U-boat losses.

Looking at the Sh5 trailer there is very short clip of 2 mosquitos attacking the Uboat (viewed thought he periscope) I like what i saw, I just hope it wasnt scripted.

People often argue that 'planes dont matter because you always dive to avoid them' - simple counter argument is this:
The very fact that you can easily dive in time to avoid EVERY single aircraft you encounter, already suggests that something is horribly wrong with them.

Using a comnination of cloud cover and Radar, Coastal Command developed some very VERY sophistacted methods of stalking & ambushing U-boats from the air.
Some Uboat crews didnt even realise the danger until the bullets started flying.

In Sh3 - radar warning made it possible to effortlessly avoid all aircraft long before they are even sighted by the watch crew.
It was nothing like that in reality.

mookiemookie 09-17-09 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JU_88 (Post 1173705)
I agree Aircraft have not been done justice in SH 3 & 4
people forget that Aircaft were responsible for almost half of all U-boat losses.

Looking at the Sh5 trailer there is very short clip of 2 mosquitos attacking the Uboat (viewed thought he periscope) I like what i saw, I just hope it wasnt scripted.

People often argue that 'planes dont matter because you always dive to avoid them' - simple counter argument is this:
The very fact that you can easily dive in time to avoid EVERY single aircraft you encounter, already suggests that something is horribly wrong with them.

Using a comnination of cloud cover and Radar, Coastal Command developed some very VERY sophistacted methods of stalking & ambushing U-boats from the air.
Some Uboat crews didnt even realise the danger until the bullets started flying.

In Sh3 - radar warning made it possible to effortlessly avoid all aircraft long before they are even sighted by the watch crew.
It was nothing like that in reality.

This. A million times this.

I want to be scared of planes. Not amused by them as in SH3, or minorly annoyed by them as in SH4.

JU_88 09-17-09 08:27 AM

yeah I remeber finding a good articale on Coastle commands ASW procedures. wish i could find it again.

one tactic was this:
When an aircrew detected a uboat with rader, they would only track it with radar long enough to mark its postion and establish an aproximate speed and heading,
Then they switched their radar off! -then they would fly for several miles AWAY from the uboat - to give the Uboats radar operator the impression they had not been detected.

Then based on the info they collected ealier they would plot an area of interception ahead of the vessle- e.g fly to the predicted locaton of where the boat might be in say, 20 mins time, (radar still off)

Once they aquired the boat by eye they'd do everything possible to attack out of the clouds - or on a clear day, out of the sun. (BOB style)

Can the devs simulate this? not really no, they'd need volumetric cloud particle for starters...
But they could randomize aircraft dection somewhat -both radar warning and the eyes of the watch crew...that would improve things :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.