YukonJack_AK |
08-20-09 04:06 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wulfmann
(Post 1155028)
UBI will not put out a game that can not be run but by a few wealthy guys in a down economy.
|
Not to pick on you Wulfmann, but did you see Assassins Creed? The minimums didn't run the game at all and even the recommended specs had a hard time... so please don't even suggest that Ubisoft is "consumer minded".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wulfmann
(Post 1155028)
By Mid range i would say 3.0GHZ Dual core, 4GB DDR RAM and a better 512MB 256bit video card but I would suggest it will need a higher end VC at least a now top of the line 1GB (285, 4870 minimum) to satisfy most of us but all is conjecture at this point.
Ubi is in this to make money and that means it has to look really good but be able to run on a mid level PC
|
When was the last time you saw a major title from a major developer being released for a sub-par platform? Come on... The state of the economy and what people can afford has nothing ot do with it. Look at Farcry 2, Fallout 3, GTA4, etc... they were NOT dev'd for "mid-level" systems. Matter of fact, some of these games are why I decided on starting a new build.
If I were to make a copuple of educated guesses:
I'd say minimum Quad-Core CPU (it was the recommended for Assassins Creed)...
Minimum of 4.0GB of RAM (WIN7 is lighter - assuming SH5 is WIN7 ok - but Assassins Creed recommended 3.0GB and ran like crap)...
And a video card with atleast 256MB (but I'd recommend atleast a 512 or better... of a decent GPU... no bargain-bin OpenGL crap)
|