![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Then again this was gradually implemented only after the 68 revolts. |
Quote:
You can't make ppl change their ways by constantly reminding them of their sins. Especially when 64 years after that a younger generation is still held accountable for these crimes, while wherever they look the Nazis are praised as the greatest soldiers of all time. Something goes seriously wrong there. |
I have no proof but a gut feeling that your average German in those days we're just as scared S*** LESS as anyone else of AH and his henchmen.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think Germany's problem is that the nazi era is still too recent. Although it seems like a long time to us in the modern age, 64 years is nothing when it comes to making people stop thinking of such earth shaking events as the holocaust and WW2. Heck we even still have a living memory of those times.
For example it's taken 700 years for people to stop thinking of Italians as Romans and even now there are those who will attempt to draw such comparisons when it suits them. I expect it will be the same unless Germany becomes better known for something else. But I think if your young people decide to, as you put it, "live up to the reputation" it will only serve to make the impression even more long lasting. |
Public support was there, maybe not at a constant high and certainly not to the degree foreign folks often make it out to be, but in general it was. Enough to not threaten Nazi rule anyways.
|
Nobody is asking Germany to carry it's past with it forever. What i'm saying is that you shouldn't feel bad for it either.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I doubt there is a country in Europe that doesn't have a section of it's population or a political movement that purports to support nazi tendancies.
The key is how the rest of society manage the situation, stop them spreading the vile and evil hatred they spew and keep them in check. |
Quote:
Although the Nazis were the strongest party their star was already sinking as they lost votes during the last free election (despite massive terror and intimidation by the SA against other parties). The problem was that resistance was fragmented into various factions. Hitler was "appointed" Chancellor by monarchist President Hindenburg who believed that germans need a "strong hand" like the old Kaiser. For Hitler this was his last and only chance as he was obviously unable to win through regular elections before. When Hitler finally grabbed ultimate power no german voter was asked anymore - and after that, demonstrating against a million men army of thugs like the SA with a good chance of ending in a torture cellar was not smartest thing to to by a man of woman with a family at home ... |
Not voting him into directly. Why were the Nazis getting so many seats in the Reichstag in the first place? Why did their party balloon in size during the early 30s? Even if they were losing popularity just before Hitler became chancellor, they had to *be* popular in the first place.
You're right in that plenty of people in Germany had considered the Nazis to be violent lunatics from Day 1. The problem is plenty MORE thought they were national icons. Just look at the obscene popularity Hitler gained after Mein Kampf, the Nuremburg Rallies, etc. Crowds as far as the eye can see. Of course, even that's still barely an excuse. White Rose and Rossenstrasse all occured during the 40s, the height of Nazi power. They didn't let the Nazi bogeymen scare them. |
If I could have the chance to sit down and have a beer with Karl Donitz, I would...:salute:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.