![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I missed this part the first time around:
Quote:
|
Maybe survivors told the story.:06:
|
but is not close to the torpedo arming limit?
|
I agree. They probably didn't want to get closer because the torpedoes might not arm. My point was that I've never read any report of a u-boat being lost that way, and even if there was one it would hardly translate to 'many'.
|
Quote:
Bob |
bobchase, I found more info.The event took place in heavy seas in the last night of the Bismarck chase, 26th/27th of may. The destroyer group was the 4th flotilla of commodore (?) Phillip Vian, consisting of: HMS Cossack, HMS Maori, HMS Sikh, HMS Zulu and ORP Piorun. Piorun was an N class destroyer but according to the account, all ships suffered from the same phenomenon.
Here is what Piorun's commander had to say (my translation): When we have reached the ordered speed of 26 knots all five destroyers lost all manouverability, which was by the way forseen by admirality's 'ships' manouverability description' (?). With strong wave from the stern and speeds above 25 knots the ship went totally out of control. With the stern rising high and the bow ploughing deep in the water, the ship listed to either side, until the list of 60 degrees (!) and in this position it turned either way taking in water through superstructures and ventilation. When the stern was pushed around by the waves 120-150 degrees off course and the ship was bow to the waves again, the ship slowly righted itself and begun to respond again to rudder and engines. It's worth noting that at that moment, Piorun had less than 40% of fuel on board, and although in theory it was a ship that was immune to capsizing, trying to navigate in horizontal position and being completely helpless must be considered a difficult experiment indeed. Taken from Jerzy Pertek's 'Wielkie dni malej floty' (Small fleet's great days), 1972 edition (on a side note I'm surprised you could buy a book like this in Poland at the time...). |
Interesting read so far... what bothers me is to calculate the described depth from fathoms to meters every time... :shifty:
|
I am just a thick skulled jarhead, but I have spent time on smaller naval vessels. We called them gator freightors. They were really amphibious warships. The smallest one in service at the time was an LST(Landing Ship Tank) It was the USS San Bernadino, no longer in service. These ships had no keel, they were flat bottom boats, so they could navigate very close to shore.
I was on this ship on my way to the Philipines when we got caught in the edge of a typhoon. I can tell you that we were at the mercy of the Pacific. I was literally walking on the bulkheads from the pitch and roll we were experiencing. I don't know how high the winds or waves were as we were confined to below decks untill we escaped the storm. |
Quote:
'greet' us. Not a pretty thought, even after 35 years. A 60 degree roll seems extreme but when the sea is your mistress, anything is possible when you make her mad. Our ships' roll-meter stopped at 45 degrees but that doesn't mean that theirs had too. Anyway, they were pretty lucky that they didn't have water go down the funnel and put their lights out too. Bob |
Quote:
I'm glad that, as a ground pounder, that you got to enjoy some rock, some roll, and some good 'ol Navy cook'in. Chief Chase, USN |
Sorry to veer off track, but I just read the intro...
What a bunch of hypocritical horse sh*t. I read and loved The Cruel Sea, but Monsarrat is dead wrong. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.