Piraticy ends when the Mighty take charge.........They (Pirates) will prevail until they get their Ass kicked hard enough...........We're talking bands of regenades who only know one thing, violence to get what they want......If it's violence they want it, bring on.....Only the mighty survive

look out, otherwise the future will turn out like crimson skies!(2000 game):doh: :doh: :doh: :o :o

Christ, I feel like I'm in Dr. Strangelove...:doh:

Welcome to GT, where all of mankind's problems can be solved by the application of MORE FIREPOWER.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Piraticy ends when the Mighty take charge
They (Pirates) will prevail until they get their
Ass kicked hard enough
We're talking bands of regenades who only know one thing,
violence to get what they want

If it's violence they want it, bring on
Only the mighty survive

Make the pie higher!
Make the pie higher!

Right on! They need to sink every last one of them on sight and not pick up survivors. (my be u-boats in the area)

This is already underway.

But it has not deterred attacks on ships.

And it has been shown that one ship with one helo is just not sufficient to guard that much.

This stuff makes for interesting reading:
http://informationdissemination.blog...ix-months.html

"The article lays out an atmosphere of tension, stress, and anxiety among the ships of the convoy. As the French ship mans battle stations, they search in the night for the suspected vessel that spooked the Barrock. As the tension rises, other ships also start issuing alerts, and the story ends by describing what amounts to a panicked night in the convoy with the French frigate chasing ghost sightings for several tense hours"



I would say more maritime patrol aircraft on staion would be important in successfully guarding such convoys, allowing ships to be able to weed out false alarms and not risk sending thier helo out on a wild goose chase making it out of reach when really needed in a hurry.
A carrier from either the USN or an EU country would probably be a valued asset.

That would be the invasion that allowed the collection of warlords to extend their powerbase beyond Baidoa again and also cemented the position of the Puntland administration .
So no , nothing to do with Clinton or the small AU deployment .

A Carrier might be a bit much, maybe a LHA/LHD outfitted in a Sea Control Ship aircraft load out as the flagship of the present multi-national flotilla. This increases air assets, adds another hull for escort or patrol duties, and provides additional fire power, and ship boarding capability if necessary.

I said what I mean. That includes germany.

Germany - that is so schizoid in patrolling the waters there that now we start to reflag our own warships, and raise other national flags onboard when doing this with regard to pirate, and flag other national flags onboard when doing that with pirates - just so that we will not do it under a german flag.

Would that be possible in the proud British navy, or the self-confident US Navy? Denyiong your own armed forces, ashaming those serving in them by declaring the temporarily servinf another country instead of Germany?

Politicians. Kick them, kick them twice, and then kicik them again. And when they still dare to move after that: kick them until the sun sets on the very same day - just one year later. :dead:

Is there a pro-defense party that have a wide enough platform that you might be willing to support? Or is the ghost of the Third Reich still scarying many in your country about the honor it is serving their nation while carrying arms? Or is it that they fear the return of an offensively minded nation?

I have meet very few germans that I have come to know, but those that I have have very liberal leanings, but a very healthy respect of those who carry arms, and serve in uniform. Is this a minority?

Doesn't operating under a unifying flag, such as the EU or NATO, provide operational cover for those so opposed to Germany putting its weight behind the will of lawful nations in defending the common SLOCs?

Feel free to call me an ignorant American. Not like I would be the first to be called it. I know we have been on opposite sides of things the few times we have been at it, but any understanding you can provide about the German Public's opinions regarding Germany's anti-piracy efforts would provide an interesting insight.

[quote=JALU3]That would fit the bill, but you would want to see more land based MPA aircraft assigned and integrated into the force.

But I don't think a carrier would provide wasted power.

With a USN Carrier or the Charles de Gaulle you would have organic E-2 Hawkeyes, the felxibility of another platform from which to replenish your surface combatants, and the deterrance of fast jets operating over the Area.

If such a resource were to be available I doubt its something the Commanders around the Horn of Africa would turn down.
Though I do realise that is a big assumption with forces stretched as they are.

Send an SSN to the area and when the money's handed over and they think they've gotten away with it...BOOOM!!!

Never thought I'd hear you say something so violent with all your anti-violence. I'm beginning to think that the only violence that is bad, no matter how in the right it may be in the defense of itself, is American.

-S

I have no impression formed on how much the public supports the anti-piracy operation. Regarding the flagging thing, it is being raised by politicians, and also owes to an overly complicated legal situation that even is more complicated in Germany - at least so I was told - than international maritime laws already are. the reflagging is not being done due to calls raised from civil groups.

But remember - our leaders also stubbornly evade to call the mission in Afghanistan a war, and martial action. Only once a killed German soldiers has been officially called a soldiers KIA. All others, even if being killed by bombs and fire, were avoided to be described as losses in war.

with the exception of the usual suspects - the Green, the left (we have a party that indeed is called The Left), juvenile anarchists opposing everything, and self-perceiving philantrophists, I would say that the wide public has a much more relaxed relation to German armed forces today than for example 25 y<ears ago, at the end of my school days. whule most are adamant in their opposition to afghanistan, being in uniform usually does not trigger any social alienation or even hostility anymore. That is even more true in cities that have had a long presence of NATO allied contingents (Brits, Dutch) stationed with them, since these troops socially isolated themselves very much from German society, on the other hand members of foreign armed forces use to wear their uniform in public more naturally and more relaxed, it seems to me (but maybe it is just me). German military is very stiff both in verbal tone and public behavior. Compared to that the easiness in behavior of American troops in the berlin brigade - from a German perpsective - was almost provoking! :lol: Brits and Yanks surely are more relaxed regarding these things. I live in close proximity to British military over here, right down my street - at least as long as the garrison is not shut down (planned for). Where an occasional contact took place it - what happened time and again -, it was very relaxed. I found it easy to handle them, i like them. that they were military and sometimes in uniform never was anythign you spend a thought on. but german soldiers in uniform moving freely around - still gets them some gazes in their backs. Maybe not unfriendly, but not perceived as such a normal sight like for example a Dutch officer going home on bicycle (true, you see them a lot here, biking in uniform). For some reason the Dutch always seem to have something to laugh or to smile about. :D