![]() |
Looking good!
How about the many new torpedo models? They are not to be taken lightly also :) As well as the Ka-27 Helix? |
Quote:
|
I'll do some torpedoes tomorrow can someone send me the new kilo and seawolf my ip is banned for there for some damn reason:damn: I seen something saying there moving there site and this is causing problems. Tell me the seawolf looks good please.
|
I dont know exactly about openings doors. tomorrow i'll ask the author and give you to know.
also, in next addition will be included SSN Sturgeon. sorry, but pic's are still not available. |
One thing I noticed from the May beta version: all the towed arrays have very small baffles compared to standard DW and LWAMI. I tried Ohio, Oscar-II and Trafalgar - their towed array blind spot is only 20 degrees. That's much less than in LWAMI or standard DW. Why is this?
|
Maybe Lwami exagerated in the opposite sense ?
Having a 60 degree baffle for the towed array, and an even bigger baffle for the bow array (more than 100 degrees if I'm not mistaken) is waaaay to much, I have problems thinking that in real life subs have such great baffle areas. |
Take a look at SCX, that made the baffle smaller.
|
The Greenville Incident report may have contributed to Lwami baffle increases, particularly with the SA.
After playtest with the Beta I like much of RA, but find the Adcap and Ugst performance unintelligent ! Under 'Truth' the torps exhibit little of the sensitivity developed in Lwamis fine work. |
Quote:
All is possibile, but really, you would think these multi-billion $ machines would have baffles riduced to the minimum. C'mon 120 degrees baffles for the bow array ? Thats just crazy in my humble opinion. |
Nobodys claiming that 1) baffles caused incident... or 2) they were 120 deg !
Just that, if you have read report, that baffles were greater than 60 deg. and less than 120 deg. That 'may' have been one factor which influenced Lwami changes - the matter was aired at the time. |
Quote:
Lwami just choose to go with the biggest value. I would have choosen a more conservative value around 80 degrees. There is also a gameplay consideration, by using extremely big baffles you make it very improbable or difficult to track a contact using 2 passive sensors at the same time. Thats why I appreciate RA, its easier now to use ba and ta to track contacts. :cool: |
The baffle area isn't created by the ships screw, but the ships hull. That spherical array attaches to the hull which masks any contact aft of that line.
Same thing for the conformal array if equipped. The towed array, say perhaps 1200 feet in length, the actual sensors can only occupy a length somewhat less than the platforms hull. At full deployment, that would put the forward beam some 900 feet behind ownship. Assuming a 30 foot beam, that subtends to a 2 degree angle. The towed array is useless while manuevering, so why a large baffle for the towed array? |
From the Greeneville report:
Quote:
|
The NTSB had no business investigating this as it did not involve a public mode of transportation or a manner open to the public for private use.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.