Zayphod |
08-28-08 02:19 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by conus00
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zayphod
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbeast
Personally I can see no logic in having a higher age of consent for Homosexual sex than Hetrosexual sex. If a 16 year old is deemed physically and mentally mature enough to have straight sex than why should a gay 16 year old have to wait another couple of years?
|
Personally, I think all consent should be locked in at 18. Period.
If you're old enough to join the military at that age, you should be
old enough to know what ELSE you're doing, too....male OR female
(and WHO you're doing it with, too).
Just my 2¢
|
Just out of curiosity: How many people around you you know waited (or are willing to wait) to have a sex until they are 18? Give me an honest answer...
Furthermore I believe that "drinking age" in the US should be 18. 21 is ridiculous!
|
To answer your question, hardly anyone waits until they're legal now-a-days. Still, one must set a standard somewhere. 18 is the legal age of consent in the US (at least, most of the US, anyway). It's also the age where you can legally sign a contract as well (meaning the contract you sign when one joins the military, and therefore any other kind of contract as well).
As far as the drinking age issue is concerned, here, it should be 21 and kept there - lots of these kids just can't hold their liquor. It was raised, I believe, due to the huge number of alcohol-related deaths among that age group (car accidents, etc). Once raised, those deaths went down in numbers. Now, being realistic, of course, I doubt anyone actually WAITS until they're 21 to start drinking, but one must set a standard on something somewhere along the way.
Of course, if one is in the military, an automatic exemption should be put into place. If you're old enough to vote and kill, you're old enough to drink the blood, gore and guts out of your brain.
Yeah, I know - double standard. Then again, the average 19 year old doesn't go around killing people for real in a war.
|