![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
PD |
No onboard Sonar? :o That's an interesting development. Makes sense though but you'd have thought she'd have some form of active sonar, unless it's a Greenpeace related issue. Good to see that she's making full use of Fire Scouts too. She should be quite the ship in littoral deployments. Good luck to her :up:
|
Quote:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ignconcept.jpg A littoral fighting ship is a sensible role for the world's navies to fill but I think both of these ships - Freedom and Independence - are unfortunately overengineered and overpriced solutions. The logistics runaround that the USN will need to contend with when shuttling around the TEUs containing the mission modules also does not sit well with me. |
I'm impressed, it's a good idea. I look forward seeing how it works out once they've got the initial logistical and design bugs ironed out.
|
Quote:
Here is the Anti Submarine option: Anti-Submarine Warfare In all mission configurations the LCS shall have core systems that provide the capability to detect threat torpedoes at sufficient range to permit initiation ofeffective countermeasure and/or maneuver action to defeat the threat. When equipped with the appropriate ASW Mission Package, the LCS will conduct multi-sensor ASW detection, classification, localization, tracking and engagement ofsubmarines throughout the water column in the littoral operating environment. The LCS will have the capability to embark ASW/multi-mission helicopters and unmanned vehicles, and will utilize Undersea Surveillance Systems, environmental models and databases. The Mission Package will enable LCS to:
Testing conducted in mid-2006 offshore of Lockheed Martin’s Riviera Beach, FL facility verified two important parameters for the Sea TALON program’s capabilities to serve aboard the LCS. The tests demonstrated that the RTAS and RTA could achieve the necessary depth for the best acoustic performance and that the RMV’s stability was not affected during the towing of the active source and passive receiver at various speeds and depths. Sea TALON successfully leverages several important Navy programs and technologies, including towed array development, use of common software baselines to achieve efficient use of computer programming resources, plus the unmanned vehicle and architecture from RMS. Further in-water testing was conducted in late 2006 at the Navy’s test facility at Seneca Lake near Syracuse, NY. Final integration and test were conducted in 2007 at Lockheed Martin’s Riviera Beach, FL facility. Its rapid development and maturity enabled delivery to the first LCS ASW Mission Package in 2008. |
One thing that you guys may not know - it will be almost as quiet as a sub.
Here is something very peculiar to this ship - notice - No Prop! No prop makes low noise. It also allows it to operate in extremely shallow water: http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...s-side-001.jpg |
No big sonar dome hung on the bow will allow the 45 kts and above top speed.
Sonar wipes out at those speeds anyway ... those little helio's can track sonar bouy's anyway. |
There's no countermeasure for any wave homing torpedo once they home on your wave. The torpedo will keep on making zee-zags around the position of the wave while getting closer to you (a S shaped loop) and it goes BOOM when it gets sufficiently close
BTW, I don't think a LST should be used to detect and sink subs. This job is best left to corvettes or hunter killers |
Quote:
when peolpe used active sonar to track (asdic anyone?) we got around that by developing a decoy that reflected sound waves, representing the target, and hooray, a countermeasure was developed which was effective when employed properly. When people used passive sonar in homing torps etc, we developed nixie decoys etc, again a decoy to represent the target. take it away from the ocean, apply it to anything military - when the enemy develops something new to attack you with, you come up with something newer to defend yourself with. So why everyone keeps saying these wake-homing torps are unavoidable i'll never know |
So this baby will be able to track down the Swedish submarine?
(The USN have been very unsuccessful in doing that some tests last year) |
Subman where did you get that pic from. Would be good to have some dimensions on it.
|
Incredible design, I am very impressed indeed. The cushion design, is that in case of groundings?
|
Check the link, it's from globalsecurity.org, although it's a diagram of the now defunct Raytheon offering.
|
Quote:
The only way that I know to reduce the risk is to change the propeller design? (the one that is proposed to fit in the next UK carrier). Not sure whether there are any other which I have overlooked |
Fooling the wake-homers shouldn't be a problem:
Active Sonar - Spoof the Bounce Contact Passive Sonar - Spoof the Sound Source Wake-Homer - Spoof the Wake, I'm surprised such a thing doesn't exist yet Also, You can always mount something like the old Torpedo-Nets on your stern that will detonate the Torpedo before it gets close, after all, it HAS to come from the stern... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.