peterloo |
04-10-08 08:54 AM |
Obviously, the Olympic games has evolved from an event for competitors to show off their talent and ability to a game which is heavily commercialized, with some political odour. The atletes, are just tools employed to gain benefit
Today's atletes, as what you guys have said, weilds high tech gadgets and designs, in order to win, by a difference of 0.01s, which cannot be differentiated by our naked eye, without the aid of modern day technologys.
In this sense, I agree with what you mean, the meaning of the games which represent our quest to unleash our full potentials, has faded out, replaced by some benefits driven by endless greed.
Now the value is not loss due to supressions in Tibet, but due to the money obessed merchants and all selfish world leaders who aim for national glory.
Your suggestions are nice, but I don't think IOC will ever think about it. Remember, IOC is yet another greedy commitee. Without donations from countries and without sweet talk tactic, the right to hold the Olympics will NOT be granted. This is granted, through.
How about giving each country a vote, and let them cast their vote to decide which will be hosting country. This would be fair, I think, and the effect of IOC on the result will be minimumized.
|