![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
it beggars belief to have to state that the intellectual level and depth of argument given in a DM article no matter how biased (either way..there are other newspapers with other biases) is actualy given with greater depth than that on public display from the Politicians them selves..ie what the politicians accuse each other of in 20 words..the newspaper at least stretch out to a column or two ..one wonders what might occur if the politicians were given a new accord to rule their debates...in that they remain speaking for no less than 5 minutes before interruption is allowed with the caveat as a balance ..that if they cannot speak about the subject for the full 5 minutes they shall not be allowed the opportunity to speak in the first place... why? because if they cannot speak for that length of time on a subject of professional interest then they should be sacked immediately anyway....and again the caveat that if the opposition cannot remain silent for that length of time and listen then they haven't truly considered what was being said in any manner other than to claim indifference or contempt for what was being said..this goes either way... we do expect our politicians to have thought about their political decisions...and if they have thought about them then they must be able to string a half decent sentence or two about why and how those decisions were arrived at..(without resorting to the assistance of spin doctors) this myth that any one party is better than another with no middle ground is mere propoganda propogated (ahem) in order to elicit said emotional response from the public...other wise no one would have any reason to vote one way or another... sadly this cr*p is what passes for politics ..us and them either or...black white "for or against" and it is wholy useless in the real world..in fact it is worse than useless ..it's an insult and should be treated with the contempt it deserve no matter where it eminates from..before we end up voting for our government on some insane version of "big brother" or the "X-Factor" what i mean here is that it is what happens in the House of Commons itself that sets the tome to be repeated by the rest of the media..and sadly slowly over time the reverse has also become true...creating a whirlpool of meaningless soap opera nonsense where there should be genuine intelligent debate..whew what a scorcher... |
Politics.....Often such an entertaining word :damn:
http://imgcash3.imageshack.us/img144...popcornkf8.gif |
I might be off base here but the presence of the letter "u" in Labor was a pretty blatent tip off... :yep:
|
Quote:
Perhaps there wasn't room. ;) |
Reality - 9 of the top ten have constituencies in Scotland, and similiarly far-away-from-London places.
Sorry, English language. |
Quote:
:hmm: No They have their own parliament up there YET still attend the one in London So whats the point of the Scottish parliament ? |
Quote:
Thats because decisions that are made in London effect Scotland. Quote:
|
In the words of Mr Wallace...FREEDOM!! ;)
|
except his words were not about freedom as we see it but not paying taxes man get you history right and dont believe the ramblings of autrailian directors
|
Yer right......been watchin too many of his anti Brit films of late http://imgcash5.imageshack.us/img144/4221/jumpad9.gif
|
Duplication of resources
If motions affecting Scotland still need to be made in London then no need for the Scottish Parliament Typical waste of OUR money |
Quote:
|
There isnt
lol But moving along The Scottish still have local councils\authorities too The Scottish parliament hasnt done away with them Just added an extra tier of bureaucracy No wonder 9 out of the top 10 expence artists are Scottish All that travelling between the UK and Scottish parliament I wonder if that means they have to have 3 homes :hmm: |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.