Quote:
Originally Posted by Chock
I suspect a lot of US Americans cannot locate the US on a map, because they haven't had a war with themselves in recent times.
|
No, it's pretty much just because our public education system sucks. If I had a strong predilection to conspiracy theories, I'd suspect it was a plot to keep our population ignorant and docile. They only reason I don't is because of the NEA and AFT -- but they have , unquestionably, exacerbated the problem. More people are turning to some form of home-schooling, mostly out in the rural areas because they can afford it. Not easily, but much easier than urban areas.
It's also unfortunate that the only required world history is a single course in high-school, and it focuses exclusively on European history -- Africa and other nations only in relation to events in Europe. South America, all of Asia, Australia, Russia and eastern Europe are non-incorporated. The university sciences programs (math, chemistry, physics, engineering, programming [compsci]) require only American government history.
It's a wicked, wicked rough program. A lot of the problem stems to the liberal cowards in California (
http://tron-chaser.net/images1/ani_emotrant.gif) selectively configuring textbooks to omit inconvienent details that any pitiful (literally -- the selections are dependent on the liberals having pity for the group) group files complaint with various publishers and authors. California is such a massive market, the publishers acquiesce to the requests, and that's what the whole country gets. Baby-killing neocons do the same thing where they can, in the exact opposite manner, of course, but we have more liberal universities than conservative.
Classic example of all this is Augusto Pinochet. He was a baby-killing neocon warmonger, raping gold, looting babies, burying detractors alive in mass graves. Never mind what Chile has become because of the specific changes he made and then left the country (i.e.
abdicated) -- he was eviler than Hitler*. Or at least, if the guy is even mentioned in the American education system, that's the portrayal.
* Why is Hitler always the pinnacle of evility? Why isn't it Mao Zedong? Why not Saloth Sar? Why not Ghengis Khan? Or Saladin? Or David, with his bag of 200 foreskins (which he probably didn't take the time to just cut off the actual foreskin, and so it was actually a bag of 200 penises)? Why not Napoleon? Or Stalin? Or Che Guevera? Or Castro?
It really ticks me off that he's the standard, when he was a
amateur in comparison to Stalin. Stalin stacked up more dead bodies in a week than Hitler did in a month.