SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Aussies repel Iranian Navy (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=117130)

Boris 06-23-07 06:26 AM

The Aussie accent is the most neutral accent ever... the fact that you can most effectively imitate every other accent from an Aussie one should prove this :yep:

Biggles 06-23-07 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bookworm_020
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Gotta love the Aussies. They're like Texans with funny accents... :D

Whadya mean? They both have funny accents!

What accent???:) The rest of the world has them, we don't!

Here is how it has been reported in Australia

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/aus...019309654.html

The colourful language used would be interesting to know, most likely along the lines of the parental and sexual history of the Iranian saliors, clothing style and a personal opion of where they stick their request!:doh::rotfl:

maybe something about the differences between australian and Iranian beer:rotfl:

DAB 06-23-07 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baggygreen
In all seriousness though, it seems strange to me. If the British were caught half on the ropes and half not, then it shoulda taken less time for them to get back onboard in a defensive possie. i mean, the aussies were able to get everyone back on board, and we have to assume there would be a similar amount of warning for the 2 instances.. whats up with the poms?

Rules of engagement.

All militaries (in domocratic countries) are subject to government control. Austriallia has a conservative government which probably keeps the Australlian military on a nice relaxed leash. The Aussies therefore had the freedom to use their own judgement in the situation.

The Blair goverment is the ultimate example of micromanagment, to the extent that there are no new ships being built now with Command and Control facilities in the Royal Navy (to my knowledge) because Labour thinks its better that it commands the fleet directly from London. I'd imagine the rules of engagement therefore for the British sailors were exceptionally different.

Also remember that the incidents took place two years apart. In Dec 04, people were not talking about being on the verge of war with Iran

Jimbuna 06-23-07 03:54 PM

Good on yer cobbers :up: If only we could heed the lessons :hmm:

bookworm_020 06-24-07 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAB
All militaries (in domocratic countries) are subject to government control. Austrialia has a conservative government which probably keeps the Australlian military on a nice relaxed leash. The Aussies therefore had the freedom to use their own judgement in the situation.

Yes and no, There are plenty of restrictions with the rules of engagement. They did use good judgement in avoiding capture, but they still couldn't fire unless fired apon (They didn't fire a single shot)

There is some flexablitiy in decision making for the ones in charge, at all levels, but there is only so much room to work in.

Here is the lastest report.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-31477,00.html

So much for Australian's being brave

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegrap...001021,00.html

It's a bit of a media beat up, I reckon!:roll: Everyone knows that the vast majority of Aussie troops are not near the front line, in Iraq or Afganistan. We are not covering any of the dangrous areas in Iraq (well less dangrous than most!).

Onkel Neal 06-24-07 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6228342.stm

Quote:

Iranian naval forces in the Gulf tried to capture an Australian Navy boarding team but were vigorously repelled, the BBC has learned. The incident took place before Iran successfully seized 15 British sailors and Marines in March.
The lessons from the earlier attempt do not appear to have been applied in time by British maritime patrols.


Gotta love the Aussies. They're like Texans with funny accents... :D

Yeah, like Texan with different accents. Us Texans have accents, you know ;)

Aussies are sort of like the international version of Texans, resourceful, self-reliant, tough, and scrappy, only without the Mexican food :cry: If there had been a couple dozen Aussies at the Alamo, we might have won the damn thing.

bookworm_020 06-24-07 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens
Yeah, like Texan with different accents. Us Texans have accents, you know ;)

Aussies are sort of like the international version of Texans, resourceful, self-reliant, tough, and scrappy, only without the Mexican food :cry: If there had been a couple dozen Aussies at the Alamo, we might have won the damn thing.

I'm sure a buch of Aussie's hurling "coulorful language" and empty beer cans would keep the mexicans at arms length!:D

Reaves 06-24-07 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAB
Also remember that the incidents took place two years apart. In Dec 04, people were not talking about being on the verge of war with Iran

The exact reason why you can't compare the two situations. Differant times, differant threats. :yep:

U-533 06-25-07 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bookworm_020

So much for Australian's being brave

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegrap...001021,00.html

It's a bit of a media beat up, I reckon!:roll: Everyone knows that the vast majority of Aussie troops are not near the front line, in Iraq or Afganistan. We are not covering any of the dangrous areas in Iraq (well less dangrous than most!).

Don't beat yourself up mate!

Quote:

The revelation forced Prime Minister John Howard to reveal Australia was supposed to withdraw troops immediately after the invasion stage.
"The understanding we had with the Americans, when we originally participated, was that after the sharp end (of the invasion) was over we weren't going to have any troop presence," Mr Howard told Channel 10's Meet The Press yesterday.
"I made it very clear that we would commit forces – if we did commit forces, they'd be committed for the sharp operational stage, the invasion stage if you like, and then after that we would not be leaving forces on the the ground.
"We would leave some naval and air units and obviously a security detachment to look after our embassy in Baghdad.
"But the whole idea was not to have troops on the ground."
A deals a deal.

I think if the Aussie forces wish to continue in this, then go back to the table and say so.
If not ...Then I'm glad yall did yer part and heres to the next one...cheers
:sunny: :sunny: :sunny: :sunny: :sunny: :sunny: :sunny:

d@rk51d3 06-25-07 05:30 AM

Yeah, they're a peacekeeping force (a task they seem to fill very well), not a deathsquad.

Jimbuna 06-25-07 02:22 PM

....and besides....those boomerangs can be deadly in the right hands ;)

bookworm_020 06-25-07 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna
....and besides....those boomerangs can be deadly in the right hands ;)

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::up:

Nice one!

Most people in Australia are in two minds over this, we would like them home, as they are needed else where for peace keeping duties (East Timor, Solomon Islands, Bougainville and else where), but many don't want to cut and run and leave Iraq in a bigger mess than when we arrived.

If the U.S. leave, then we will. We have an election coming up, which could change things.:hmm:

Jimbuna 06-26-07 06:51 AM

The second the US announce a total withdrawal all that will be visible will be smoke trails leading directly to each participating allied country (as in "you won't see their a*ses for dust") :yep:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.