![]() |
Quote:
That means a plane will be ~1.25km closer to the IXB when it slips below the surface compared to the VII. Thats notable enough for my crew. |
A couple seconds can make a world of difference.
|
Quote:
Also if the aircraft are un-realistically modeled and flit around the place at 600kmph you would still have over 2 minutes to dive if you had metox. The IXB takes 35 seconds half a minute which is 7 or so seconds then the VIIB. No major difference. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
1 mph = 0.44704 meters per second A De Haviland Mozzie will achieve 350MPH with out problem as it does a shallow dive to attack a U-boat. That's over 150m/s or 563KmPH I certainly am suggesting that aircraft travel at 600kmph! The P51D had a max speed of 703 km/h. btw...I play more IL2 than SH3. ;) |
Perfect then you do know aircraft dont travel at 30 000 feet and cant be in a constant dive. You are saying the aircraft is constantly diving towards your position im a Cessna pilot in real life and with all the pitch trim in the world they wouldn't make 600kmph. However the F6F made 650kmph at flat flying. The F6F is far more advanced then a Hurricane and if you still wont beeleive me or attempt to avoid the facts you are looking at a 1.25 km difference out of 30. Is it impossible to accept a flawed logic?
|
Quote:
As for the hawker hurricane, at sea level it could fly at 525kph (type I and II) That's 146m/s That means a plane will be 1.17km closer to the IXB when it slips below the surface compared to the VII. My crew can see a plane at about 6km distance in light fog and 10m/s waves (just tested it, obviously it will vary with date, equipment and mods). It is definitely a notable difference. |
Quote:
Anyway how about we set up a multiplayer game both run surfaced then dive when our crew spots an aircraft just so it gets in up there that I doesn't matter. Even better ill create a mission run the hurri at 330knots use people for aircraft detection and dive before he reaches me. Ill do the same with a VIIB just to make it a fair test. Sounds good. People have oppinions which differ some just use the same argument no matter what is saying not absorbing the info. Happy hunting. |
Quote:
It does depend on own tactics and your own preferences. I don't think a IX-kaleun is any more or less skilled than a VII-kaleun. By mid 1943 and on, they are all screwed-up idiots with a deathwish blinded by propaganda:) . |
Quote:
|
heh, I just can't let go of my IX... I need them torpedos, I need the range...
2nd Career sounds like a damned good idea tho |
Quote:
|
im a fan of the IX but i also love my VIIB problem for me with the IX is i hate going across the drink it takes forever. im not keen on dive time either been caught with my pants down too many times with regards to planes.
|
Quote:
|
Somewhere in the atlantic, a type 9 skipper has taken a type 7 out for a patrol:
http://www.ducimus.net/sh3/comic_01.jpg http://www.ducimus.net/sh3/comic_02.jpg http://www.ducimus.net/sh3/comic_03.jpg http://www.ducimus.net/sh3/comic_04.jpg http://www.ducimus.net/sh3/comic_05.jpg |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.