Nah, I never said I was supporting it, but it *does* seem they're the only ones who give a toss about the welfare of its existing citizens, rather than what Europe and America thinks. I'll give them careful consideration, thats for sure.

The BNP have its originin the Nazi movements in the 50's and 60's which hgave themselves a variety of name changes and makeovers, in order to disguise the fact. The BNP is a direct descendant of those National Socialist paties, but try, when in public, to present a less racist and, less white-supremasist image. You would be voting for NAZI's (and their paramilitary offspring - the black-shirted "Combat 18"). If you want to, then it's a matter of your choice, and conscience.
I won't be moving assets abroad because a) only the rich benefit from doing so and b) I believe that the avoidance of legitimate taxation is an abdication of civic duty.
I do, though, share the frustrations of people. Like others, I feel that voting is civic duty (others having died in the past to gain me that right) and I should be allowed the option of being able to tick "None of the above", as opposed to just spoiling your my paper.

What Martxyz said. The BNP is a sickening racist party.

The problem is that both the Conservative and Labour parties are afraid to deal firmly with Britain's national problems. Hence the vacuum. As everyone knows, vacuums suck. :smug:

Sample reading about the BNP: Melanie Phillips - An offensive reaction.

Don't let the BNP con you.

Hi Avon Lady (???)

Couldn't agree more. The BNP aren't just after "stemming immigration". They want repatriation and disenfranchisement of all non-British (or even non-English), non-whites, and Jews. Quite how you "send back to their own country", people whose families have been British for generations, I don't quite know. Still, the BNP never were very good in the IQ department.
The current climate of hysteria only feeds their support among the gullible.

Cheers now

Martin

No question marks required.

In theory you aren't supposed to vote for parties in British politics, you just vote for the person who you feel represents you best, what ever his party, or whoever the party leader is.

People who say it is unfair, when the person they voted for changes parties or the leader of the party changes, show that they do not know what they are voting for.


You don't vote for Jo-Politician because he is a Lib-Dem. After-all, he would be perfectly within his rights to change to Labor the day after you voted for him.

You don't vote for Jo-Politician because his leader is Mr-X. After-all, Mr-X might be voted out of his leadership by the party the day after you vote.

You don't vote for Jo-Politician because he says he is against the spoon ban. After-all, he would be perfectly within his rights to change his mind and decide he wants a spoon ban the day after you voted for him.

You do vote for Jo-Politician because you feel he will represent you well. You can take the fact that he is currently a Lib-Dem lead by Mr-X and he is against the spoon ban in to consideration when judging weather he will represent you well, but those should not be the reason you vote for him.

This may, or may not be unfair, but it is how British politics works.

Of course, some might question how legitimate they are.