SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Hamas launches war on Israel

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Hamas launches war on Israel (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=256098)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff-Groves (Post 2888716)

And that speaks to how sick the attackers are. They need to be hunted down and shot on sight! Any that harbor them? Same thing.

No to mention those here in the west who support them and I'm not talking about the Muslim living here in Europe.

Especially our left wing support them.

Markus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 2888711)

But the truth is, I found that in many countries of the region, that NOBODY, NO ARAB, likes the Palestinian Arabs. They are being used for global politics and to give the West a bad conscience, but they are very much dispised as well. Again, that has a lot, though not all, to do with the way Palestinian Arabs behaved in other Arab countries.

Yeah, it's been that way for decades too. If the Arabs were decent people, they would take in the Muslim Palestinians and just let Israel alone. For the love of god, they have continents of land. Can't the Jew have a tiny sliver?

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4Ro_idS2t...urrounded2.jpg

Palestine today appears like an afterthought in the Arab political order, with many states making peace and normalising relations with Israel Arab regimes have increasingly abandoned making any significant political effort to help the Palestinians. Instead, official support has been limited to deceptive rhetoric and symbolic gestures to avoid confrontation with Israel, and it's backer, the United States. The most that Arab governments have done in response to Israeli aggression is issue futile condemnations and protests.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onkel Neal (Post 2888723)

Who other than woke Western Civilizations would willingly take in a bunch of trouble makers? :har:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onkel Neal (Post 2888723)

According one explanation I heard a Saudi National make, he said The Koran states the land of Israel belongs to to the Jews. The Saudi went on to say that he and his kin are the offspring Ismael and have their land . And that Israel are the sons of Issac and have their land.

The eye opener was when he said the Palestinians are neither sons of Issac or Ishmael and that Netanyahu was a coward for not getting rid of them. He likened Palistinians to Gypsies and doesn’t want them in Muslim lands either. Seems Palestinians either need to assimilate into either the land of Issac or Ishmael or go somewhere else, on account that no where is it written in the Koran or Torah that they’ll inherit a land of their own

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otto Harkaman (Post 2888733)

The balloon is going up...
https://youtu.be/SsTYQYQmzVA?si=3QloJUnyH_h60hU6
https://youtu.be/oyDJf484yvY?si=dhTxv6GArKZ7wb7w

Hope all those bad dudes who walked across our wide open southern border don't have any dirty bombs. :hmmm:

I forgot to mention.. :O:

Last Tuesday I saw an RC-135 flying low over town, on its way to Des Moines.
RC-135's are colloquially known as Rivet Joint aircraft although that code word died out in the 1990's. You can tell the difference between one and a KC-135 mostly by the large black nose and the different paint scheme.
We sold some of them to the UK several years ago.

They are home-based at Offutt AFB.
They (and the E-4's) don't take off without a really good reason. :yep:

Granted, this could have been a part of that cell phone EAM test but like I said, those aircraft don't take off without a really good reason. :yeah:

Y'all might consider waking the :k_confused: up. :yep:

:salute:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET2SN (Post 2888758)

Y'all might consider waking the :k_confused: up. :yep:

:salute:

:hmmm: I bet sleepy joe wears the same pajamas.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QEE141IC4Q8/hqdefault.jpg

Meanwhile..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OagYlYna75Y

There are some points to ponder-

-Where's the PRC? I thought China was a close peer to the US? Why aren't they in the thick of the negotiations? :doh:

Otherwise, Peter does have some points. Unless he's dead-###ed wrong. :doh:
If that's the case, I'm sure he'll post a mea culpa on YouTube :har: or you can hire him to speak to your group. :up:

Nigel Farage exposes what happened when Denmark took in Palestinian refugees: 'Why on earth should we risk our national security?!'

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other...225f6a24e&ei=9

It's time our European governments faced up to these facts and gave any migrant with a criminal record the boot, will it happen in the UK? hehehe, not with two migrant leaders who are just waving these migrant currants through customs on a daily basis it wont.

Perhaps Markus can say if that link is true or not?, because I don't know what to believe anymore, the lies being spouted by these media outlets can't be trusted to tell the truth as they all seem to have a different agenda to us.

& That article leaves a lot of food for thought.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonlight (Post 2888826)

Following is copied and translated from the Danish wiki

Quote:

The Palestinian law

Palestinians had traveled from Lebanon to Denmark during 1990 and 1991, where they sought asylum on a claim that they were persecuted in Lebanon. But a tightening of case practice in the Directorate for Aliens and in the Refugee Board under the KVR government in the autumn of 1989 meant that a previous practice of automatically granting asylum to Palestinians from Lebanon had been changed, so that the cases were now assessed individually. This contributed to the assessment that 321 Palestinians were not persecuted in Lebanon and thus had their application for asylum rejected.

After the refusal, a group of 96 Palestinians chose to occupy Enghave Church and shortly after, between 7 and 8 September 1991, Blågårds Church, where parish priest Lisbeth Søe invited them inside. The occupation of Blågårds Church lasted for over five months.

The Palestinians aroused sympathy among a number of Danish organizations and individuals. 600 Danish priests signed a letter of support calling for residence permits, Danish BZers occupied the Directorate for Immigration and the Ministry of Justice in protest against the refusal of asylum. The support group was later called a "coalition of BZs, priests and humanists"

On 3 March 1992, a majority in the Folketing consisting of the Social Democracy, the Radical Left and the Socialist People's Party chose to bypass the KV government to grant collective residence permits to all Palestinians who had stayed in Denmark for more than 12 months. The law was colloquially referred to as the Palestine Law. Immediately after the adoption, many of the Palestinians chose to go back to Lebanon to celebrate the residence permit in Denmark - despite the fact that they had claimed that they had been persecuted in Lebanon.

It further emerged that 312 of the 321 allegedly persecuted Palestinians had traveled back and forth between Denmark and both Lebanon and Syria during 1990 and 1991, while they had sought asylum in Denmark, among other things to get married.

This is how it has gone for the 321 Palestinians

A study from 2003 showed that 42 percent of the 321 people who were granted asylum have since been convicted of crime, and that 74 percent of them were in some form on transfer income, including early retirement.
An estimate from 2005 showed that 56 percent of the children of the Palestinian church occupiers have been punished for crime

I thought it was better this way to copy and paste what the Danish wiki have written about the Palestinian.

So yes Nigel is correct.

Markus