Bwahhhh ha ha ha.. erm okay if you say so.

I would say there agent provocateurs.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomac...ch-us-1.293089

What's with the police-examples? Are you trying to imply that the Israelis are like the world's policemen? Wasn't that Ah-mu-ri-ca's job? Shouldn't you call the Israelis the world's deputy policemen, or something? :DL

Oh hi Steamwake, how's that oil slick - thing going? Sucessfull? :D

Police example is used because most of the members of this forum are probably more likely to have dealt with the local police as an authority figure than they are to have dealt with military police, soldiers, SWAT or other specialized paramilitary forces.

you still have not answered my question

EDIT

@ Foxtrot

you dont know yet. all you know is that someone in a police cruiser is attempting to make a stop. thats all the data you have

Nor he will. :roll:

I think your question is a bit incomplete. The said police is following what rules of engagement? local laws or international laws? Shall we consider the said police as United Nations?

Of course I have to know. I am in neutral territory, and then only police can stop me is UN with a defined set of laws. I won't stop if Naval Police of Antarctica is trying to stop me near North Pole. They simply have no jurisdiction there.

maybe not, but its fun to watch. :woot:

its a simple question.

you dont know what you have done wrong... you dont know whether or not they are in XXX jurisdiction, you dont know what the ROE is... all you know is an officer is trying to pull you over.

no spins or tricks

its very easy... almost as easy as "what color is the black horse?"

Answer the simple question. There was no comparison of Israel to the police, the question is about how in general to respond to armed authorities. Who they are matters not.

You have done nothing wrong, say at sea in the Gulf of Mexico. A Mexican vessel (coast guard) approaches, and wishes to board you, and does. Do you attack the boarders with sticks and knives, or do what they ask you to do? The authorities in the scenario ARE AT FAULT for boarding you in the first place—do you attack them, yes, or no?

A simple question.

It still does not seem legitimate to me...
Israel has no rights to extend it's blockade at will to 69 miles into int waters. It was at 48 miles before this event.

the NATO demand for immediate restituition of ships passengers and cargo reported two posts above speaks for itself about the legitimacy of this boarding...

In the Gulf of Mexico? Well first I'd look around to see if I'd be in the middle of the oil slick and if so I'd be very carefull about throwing any matches in the water. :haha:

Then I'd ask the Mexicans if they have any good tequila and mujeres waiting for me at the home port and upon receiving a positive answer I'd let them tow me to the home port.

When you're at war, you can do a lot of things that would otherwise be illegal. Like fly into another state's airspace and drop bombs on their territory.

A blockade in international waters is an act of war. Usually, that's a reason for calling it illegitimate. Except when there is already a war on.

Clicks Pen*

Opens Note Pad*

Writes: "Subject appears unable to formulate a basic answer to simple questions, probably has difficulty on some basic mental level in addressing even the most uncomplicated of scenarios as they relate to every day life."

Closes note pad*

Clicks Pen*

Returns to Subsim general topics discussion*

DOWLY "You would see they have no tequila... then stab them in the face"

exactly... then he would wonder why they gunned him down and sunk his dingy

You're too fast. :O:

:haha:

Im waiting to go to work... so every day life is on hold.

ie... i got nothing better to do than sit here and laugh at the inability of others to respond to simple questions.

even when they get a multiple choice !!!