3catcircus |
09-16-21 11:49 AM |
So - here's an interesting thought.
The US has civilian control of the military as one of the bases of how the military is organized. By definition, all military members report to the President. That whole chain of command thing.
The President is duly elected, and his actions are based upon the belief that what he is doing is in accordance with his oath of office. Even if that consists of calling another leader "Rocket Man" or taking actions that alter how the nation intersects with other nations (Paris climate, trade war with China, etc.). It does not matter that his subordinates don't like the way he carries out his duties. It isn't their place to countermand his orders or to oppose his actions. Question and advise in confidence? Sure. But that's it. As a member of the military, you're obligated to follow his orders. Or resign your commission. Enlisted are kinda screwed because they are obligated to a term of service under their contract, but officers can resign they're commission any time after their initial 5 year obligation.
Now, the JCS chair believes that the President is going to do "something" after the Jan 6th trespassing... At no point has the President violated his oath of office, and at no point has he taken clear steps to avoid a transfer of power - arresting Biden and Harris, suspending Congress, locking himself in the White House.
Yet, we're supposed to believe Milley going behind his back to allegedly prevent him from attacking China is anything other than insubordinate? The guy is still duly-elected for another 14 days, and Milley's obligation is to obey his orders as Commander in Chief. Milley has no reporting chain to Pelosi and he certainly has no authorization to call a Chinese general and tell him that he would prevent Trump from attacking China.
It may or may not qualify as treason, but it damn sure is insubordinate, it certainly is failure to obey a lawful order, and it definitely is aiding the enemy.
|