Origins of WWII
 

Speaking as an American, my country should have stayed the hell out of it. But there were many Americans who had the same view that FDR threw in jail. For one, Lindbergh would have ended up behind bars if he were not so beloved by the American public.

You may not know it, but FDR had evil designs on YOUR empire and played Winnie like an old violin.

Origins of WWII
 

I see that you just ignore Mr. Suvarov's article without addressing it. Isn't he a russian scholar?

Next you'll be asking who started the spanish civil war and try to persuade us that those pesky leftists we're the ones to blame by winning the elections...

Yes it is.

1. WWII : The overwhelming english guilt.

http://nsm08.casimages.com/img/2016/...9013889901.png

2. A crime against peace, a crime against France.

http://nsm08.casimages.com/img/2016/...9013889902.png

Sorry, I fear that I can't condense the information. All aspects are important.

First, I can give you the plan of the argumentation. It is already a big job.

*

After Germany invaded Poland, I don't see why not.

The Polish Corridor was part of Polish-Lithuanian territory before it was annexed by Prussia in the late 18th century, it had a majority Polish population which steadily grew in the interwar period and was important to the Polish economy. Certainly its incorporation into Poland was one of many harsh terms the Treaty of Versailles inflicted on Germany, but I don't think it lacked precedent or somehow justified the German invasion, which wasn't interested solely in securing it to begin with.

Suvorov was a Soviet officer and turned into a historian after his defection. There are many problems with his arguments that the Soviet Union was immediately threatening to invade Germany, mostly relating to how the state of the Red Army at the time was utterly inadequate for this sort of operation, but sticking to the subject seems to be strictly maintained in this thread.

Received a complaint the above (#229) brings issues to a members system (accompanied by some ad which prevents the recipient closing said file) so I'd appreciate it if you would save each page to a text file before posting in future.

Mmmh ... strange. These are only two screenshots of 2 documents written in french. I've posted them in order to show that it will be a big job to translate all this in english.

TBH I'm having difficulties also so there must be a problem here.

It helps to know who one is debating ... Mr Fahnenbohn can you please explain your user name?

I only found this interesting tidbit in researching your name ... not to injure your pride or anything.

http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/G...with-Nazi-link

Why don't you start by stating your strongest arguments, in your own words? That will give the people here some idea of what your case is, and allow you time to work on getting the reference documents translated. If something comes up in discussion, you can then spend the effort on that specific point, and the discussion can carry on. Otherwise, you will continue to complain about people not addressing the arguments and continue to seem evasive about actually presenting your view.

Origins of WWII
 

I'm having problems with the docs also. When I click on them or try to zoom in they go out of focus to the point where they are illegible.

I will add at this juncture that we need to make progress because failure to do so will eventually turn into a position or claim of being 'disingenuous' and my patience is not infinite.

Make your point and let the debate flourish or let the natural consequence become a reality.

No this debate took place long ago in a town called Nurenburg Germany under the eyes of the entire world by people not hiding behind the anonymity of the internet.

This debate was conducted in great form and detail and resulted in a bunch of criminals getting their just deserts. I fail to see the value in repeating this debate ad nauseum just because one side doesn't want to face up to their criminal history.

Origins of WWII
 

Partypooper! I think it's interesting and want to see where it goes.

OK. In my next post, I will write the synthesis of the argumentation, without all the details and sources, all quotes, and so on. I think this is the best way. If you want the proof of what I say, I will explain you in more details.