So what what? I was talking to Bossmark not you.

Public forum young man.:O:
So do you have a point in your post?
Is there any reason why you can object to an indian selling the BI?
Are mercs prohibitively expensive in your world?
Looks like you have no point , so to repeat the question is in relation to your post...
So what?
If you cannot defend it then don't write it.
If you want more attention to your posts which have no point....
Sounds like rubbish, you don't own much of what's under your house. Do you not know what you own and what you don't own?
If you want to stop people digging under your home then buy the mineral rights off the owner:rotfl2:

OK seeing as how you are ignorant of the facts.

Big Issue, is sold to people for pennies. These people go out into the streets of our country selling it for max profit in order to make some money to eat etc. They are usually homeless but not always.

The indian lady has a husband who can afford a fairly new Merc. So, somehow, he is making a few quid in life. So why is he sending his wife out onto the streets in winter, summer, rain and shine, to sell a magazine that is far left in nature and defo useless in content, as its commie propaganda.

If you are able to read between the lines you will see it - does not seem right and something is defo dodgy?

Tribesman, I was being sarcastic about the hole in the ground, you obviously are braindead enough to think I actually meant it. Go back to your kiddy games and leave life to the experts.

That's rich.:haha:

Is that a fact or a "fact"?
Are you ignorant?
Your post seems to suggest it.

Is that a fact or a "fact"?
Are you ignorant?
Your post certainly suggests it.

Is that a fact or a "fact"?
In fact it says nothing.

so what ?
Does it somehow exclude her from the Big Issues own criteria for vendors?
Are you ignorant?

Is he?
So what?
Maybe he is selling lots of big issues.

Now we get to the core of your problem, you are an extreme right wing nut.:yep:
Only an extremist nut could call the authors commies.
You had better tell the Spectator to stop its journalists writing in the Big Issue. :har:

Or is it all in your febrile imagination?


Young man, your attempt is pathetic:rotfl2:

Newark

By-Election



Robert Jenrick (Con) 17,431 (45.03%, -8.82%)
Roger Helmer (UKIP) 10,028 (25.91%, +22.09%)
Michael Payne (Lab) 6,842 (17.68%, -4.65%)
Paul Baggaley (Ind) 1,891 (4.89%)
David Kirwan (Green) 1,057 (2.73%)
David Watts (LD) 1,004 (2.59%, -17.41%)
Nick The Flying Brick (Loony) 168 (0.43%)
Andy Hayes (Ind) 117 (0.30%)
David Bishop (BP Elvis) 87 (0.22%)
Dick Rodgers (Stop Banks) 64 (0.17%)
Lee Woods (Pat Soc) 18 (0.05%)
Con majority 7,403 (19.13%)
15.46% swing Con to UKIP


Not a good result for Labour, but the best thing about this result is the Lib dums losing their deposit in yet another by-election :haha:

That is a bad result.
The Lib-Dems got more votes than Bus Pass Elvis:down:

thanks for that Boss, very interesting :up:

Also a nice swing from Con to UKIP, they may have done even better with a better candidate.

prob with british politics is apathy and scared to change. Predominantly labour voters which is why they appear to do so well even though they did what Hitler failed to do, invade country with millions of foreigners who are now trying to take over.

Tribe: Two things that should never be discussed on the net because of keyboard warriors. Politics and Religion. So, as a right wing fascistical born again atheist, no more with you. Without capitalism commies would starve. :rock:

UKIP - We want out of Europe cos they're all communists.

Labour - We want to stay in Europe cos we like communists.

Conservative - We want to stay in Europe we just want the communists to leave Europe.

BNP - We want to kill all Europeans

Liberal Democrats - Hello!

No earthquake in Newark then but the Tory majority was halved.

I like it. Mickael Gorbachev said that the EU is WORSE than the Soviet regime.

What made me laugh was Cameron saying this was a success and showed Britain is backing the Conservatives and Osbourne comes out saying this was a massive majority! The bloody minded short slightness of those two never fails to make me laugh. :har:

That is an interesting post.
It is amazing how you manage to take a textbook definition of reactionary conservatism and somehow attempt to reverse it.
Then you throw in a Godwin with a completely ridiculous claim for good measure.
That really is some achievement:rotfl2:
Is English your native language? As you seem to have problems with the words.

Since politics should not be discussed why are you writing about politics in a topic about politics ?:hmmm:
It does seem that once again you make no sense.
Must be that "expert" thing of yours. Well either that or just ignorance

May I suggest you check under the bed as you sound like a rerun of a really bad 1950s sensationalist paranoia piece.
After all you have already said people likeCameron Archer Dorries Currie and The Boris are commie propogandists so clearly those commies of yours must be everywhere.
Quick check behind the sofa too, they get everywhere:har:

Coupled with your earlier piece and apparent habit of simply making up rubbish to fit your political agenda you seem to bear all the unfortunate traits of a certain german on this forum who long ago sunk into insanity.

I know steed, its laughable

Any further personal insults will be dealt with appropriately.

http://home.bt.com/images/worlds-mos...0813154158.jpg

At last those gits STEED and Bossmark got a kick up their arses

http://cdn2.spectator.co.uk/wp-conte.../168378946.jpg

Nice one jim your Knighthood is in the post.

^Don't fool it jim. :03:

Right time to put the boot in again..

Right you Tory fools here are the facts yes you retook Newark but it was not a big majority your banging on about. And no it was not a great victory, got that.

UKIP +22.1%
Labour -4.6%
Conservative -8.9%
Lib Dems -17.4%

Conservative majority down from 16,152 to 7,403

STEED in next years general election I hope toffboy loses -8.9% in every seat that will soon shut the Tory fools up :haha:

Jim, if aimed at me, you have my apology, but dont think it was me :salute: