Takeda Shingen |
01-12-11 10:50 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
(Post 1572646)
Blood libel?????
OK you could let Palins camp get away with nonsense about them really depicting surveyors instruments as that was so laughable, but to now claim they are the victims and to use such phrases really sinks Palin to new lows.
|
I will give you that 'blood libel' was yet another poor selection of words by Sarah Palin, but aside from that, she does have a very good point. People jumped all over her for the picture on her website. People can call it 'unicode 2316' if that makes them feel more justified in their views, but the bottom line is that it was designed to look like a target reticule. However, the so-called Tea Party's message was also clear; they were unhappy with the voting records of certain politicians and were targeting their districts in attempts to get out the vote. There was no advocacy of assasination, and attemps to imply that there was are both diststasteful and insensitive.
Yes, it is true that Giffords herself was on television calling that image as advocacy of assasination. She was playing the political game, just like that all do; over react and make noise to demonize the opposition. There is no justification for what happened to her, but to imply that Palin is responsible is just as disgusting as other attempts to skew this tragedy for political gain.
|