Öh... yes... The other way around.

You are not a real man if you haven't had sex with both genders.

So I guess it's about time I find myself a woman

Markus

If you explain exactly why you are posting them, warn people what the content of the videos is, and they do not violate any other rules (nudity, graphic violence, etc), I do not object to you posting them. Though I would prefer if possible not to direct link to the hate sites themselves (you can often find these videos on anti hate sites too). We don't need them coming here.

Someone with a documentable history of hostility to those of faith continues that pattern (regardless of whether its "justified" on any single occasion or not) - along with hurling a personal insult regarding someone's sexuality in their following post (expressly forbidden in the TOS) and you guys choose to turn a blind eye - thats up to you. I guess some things are not hate speech when the "target" is equally hateful and despicable. I guess it all depends on the "kind" of group that its targetted at. So anyone who is an "identity christian" is a target - regardless. But because they are as a group wrong, hateful and yes - despicable - that makes such comments perfectly ok. The KKK is pretty despicable too - so I guess we can say anything we want about that group as well? Where do you draw the line on what "group" its acceptable to make blanket, generalized hateful comments about? Some people see Jews as despicable. That's one of the ways the Holocaust was allowed to happen.

I don't agree with "identity christians". But I still see a major double standard.

You guys call em like you see em.

So do I. It is what it is. I don't see a need to "do" anythng - either publicly or privately. If you do - then you know how to PM me - or take action publicly as you see fit.

The only "hostility" is the writings of those of "faith", especially those that make ridiculous claims about the scripture they claim to follow.
There is no hostility at all to people of faith or to people of no faith.

It addresses the issue.
It is widely held that the more someone screams about queens the greater the chance is that they are rather partial themselves.
Would you like a big list of very vocal homophobes who turned out to be taking deliveries by the back door?

Well done, almost correct.:yeah:
Calling a nazi a nazi isn't hate speech, calling a Klansman a racist "christian" isn't hate speech, calling a black supremacist a dumb bigot isn't hate speech, it is addressing their views.

You can call them racist scum, extreme right wing or bigots, but I don't think you can call them liberals:rotfl2:

That is simple, a statement about "christians" isn't a generalised statement about Christians any more than a statement about white supremacists is a generlised statement about "white" people.

Good, becuase I wouldn't want you to follow the trail from NC to the great northwest homeland for "white" "christian" aryan folk based on the principles of the founding fathers and true to the US constitution free of "jews, ******s, race traitors and other degenerates"........call em like you see em.

@Mods. If any words of that last neo nazi hate speech is deemed unnaceptable despite the context please censor them.

Wow! Well said. :yep:

I have seen threads take a turn. This one is making figure eights. :hmmm:

The terrible irony is that you have now described the OP, except that you left out blacks, Native Americans and Catholics. It would appear that you would be too busy trying to silence a forum rival to see that.

Just another day in the GT :03:

HunterICX

I have no issue with you brigging the OP. I pointed out way earlier in this thread that I found his tone and message way off base. I don't care who the person is - to say any group is worthy of "ripping the piss" because they are "sick puppies" is what it is. Last I read the rules - calling someone "ladyboy but not in a sexual way" - and then admitting that it was all about someone taking "deliveries in the back" was a violation as well. But you guys say its not. So be it.

The fact your hung up on some supposed rivalry between myself and the poster instead of on the content of the posts just goes to show how much of a double standard you are using.

Don't think so? Fair enough. Guess we will see.

Right. Your posts about that poster are not about that poster. The fact that you have come and done this publically is also not about this poster. The fact that you are attempting to equate ten pages of concentrated hate speech thinly masked with religious piety to a handful of offhand comments means that I am using a double standard. Okay. I've had worse said about me. Par for the course.

The simple fact is that certain individuals from every 'group' on SubSim see themselves as a minority, and an oppressed one at that. The political left thinks that they are victims of double standards. So does the political right, the atheists and the Christians. The fact that everybody feels that way is a signal to me that we're doing a good job. What irks me is when individuals try to nitpick posts in an effort to have moderators silence the opposition. But hey, dealing with that is part of the job too. :D

Don't think so? That's okay. I won't reciprocate the kind of vague threatening speech in your last sentence. That just wouldn't be cool. Peace to you, bro. I still think you're a good guy.

EDIT: Also, you are looking for 'you're', not 'your'.

A Circular Run? :hmm2:

geez :hmmm:, you sure you didnt forget someone in there?

Truthers, moon-landing deniers... :know:

:hmm2:
..
...
Oh yeah, and also leprechauns. :huh:

http://omgjeremy.com.s57441.gridserv...c5s27hcg_b.jpg

Classic:rotfl2:
Can you get it more backwards?(no pun intended)

Supposed:hmmm:
On your part......
ME ME ME ME ME:har:
your CAPS LOCK habit comes back into play and unfortunately emphasises you again well illustrating your seemingly rather blatent dishonsty on that score.:yep:

Yet it appears they are dealing with the content of the posts, rather than what you think you want those posts to be saying.

You really should have thought first before you went off on one, a topic angle dealing with nazi "christians" isn't a good location to be trying to fight your imaginary war on the mythical anti Christians you think you see.

In other news a nice development on the crazy nazi "christian" front.
Apparently that twat from NC who is running the northwestern homeland for real white people is having a problem with some of the other Nazi loons.
In a startling revelation they are now accusing the crazy white supremacist Stormfront website of being part of a global jewish conspiracy to make the nazis look bad, it kinda makesthe OPs past suggestion that Subsim is a Jewish conspiracy pale in comparison:woot:
Nazis don't ya just love em...but not in a gay way:03: