Catfish |
04-26-22 12:02 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna
(Post 2805628)
Fokker?
|
Not a Fokker of any kind. Also Anthony Fokker was dutch, not german. The allies did not want to pay Fokker to construct planes for them, so he asked Germany.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aktungbby
(Post 2805680)
Igo Etrich designed Taube? He sold out his aircraft production company in 1914...:hmmm:
|
Time would be about right, but it is not an Etrich or Rumpler Taube. Rumpler b.t.w. was an a$$hole as he simply copied the origonal Etrich Taube plane and sold it under his Rumpler name, making Igo Etrich go bankrupt. Since there was no real patent held by Etrich, a lot of other aircraft producers built taube planes with all kinds of developments or changes, one was even completely made of steel ("Stahltaube"). This is not a T. of any kind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddahaid
(Post 2805685)
Oh yeah, that makes sense.
|
A bit, but a Taube looks different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aktungbby
(Post 2805692)
EGADS! A plaudit from the continuum's better half!:O: proof I don't need Aricept...yet:hmmm::timeout::shucks:
|
Maybe not but it still is not a Taube :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddahaid
(Post 2805695)
Yes, but I still haven't found a match in photo searching which is worrying.
|
You will find no Taube photo matching :03:
Big hints: The photo is supposedly taken from one of the "Militaertyp" planes, maybe during the war, in the eastern front theater, or (if before the war) at least in the east.
As said before the war, the civilian version made a record flight. A lot of german planes did at that time, but this was a distance record.
edit the type on the photo indeed has ailerons.
|