SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Hamas launches war on Israel

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Hamas launches war on Israel (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=256098)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onkel Neal (Post 2888723)

Yeah, it's been that way for decades too. If the Arabs were decent people, they would take in the Muslim Palestinians and just let Israel alone. For the love of god, they have continents of land. Can't the Jew have a tiny sliver?

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4Ro_idS2t...urrounded2.jpg

According one explanation I heard a Saudi National make, he said The Koran states the land of Israel belongs to to the Jews. The Saudi went on to say that he and his kin are the offspring Ismael and have their land . And that Israel are the sons of Issac and have their land.

The eye opener was when he said the Palestinians are neither sons of Issac or Ishmael and that Netanyahu was a coward for not getting rid of them. He likened Palistinians to Gypsies and doesn’t want them in Muslim lands either. Seems Palestinians either need to assimilate into either the land of Issac or Ishmael or go somewhere else, on account that no where is it written in the Koran or Torah that they’ll inherit a land of their own

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otto Harkaman (Post 2888733)

The balloon is going up...
https://youtu.be/SsTYQYQmzVA?si=3QloJUnyH_h60hU6
https://youtu.be/oyDJf484yvY?si=dhTxv6GArKZ7wb7w

Hope all those bad dudes who walked across our wide open southern border don't have any dirty bombs. :hmmm:

I forgot to mention.. :O:

Last Tuesday I saw an RC-135 flying low over town, on its way to Des Moines.
RC-135's are colloquially known as Rivet Joint aircraft although that code word died out in the 1990's. You can tell the difference between one and a KC-135 mostly by the large black nose and the different paint scheme.
We sold some of them to the UK several years ago.

They are home-based at Offutt AFB.
They (and the E-4's) don't take off without a really good reason. :yep:

Granted, this could have been a part of that cell phone EAM test but like I said, those aircraft don't take off without a really good reason. :yeah:

Y'all might consider waking the :k_confused: up. :yep:

:salute:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET2SN (Post 2888758)

Y'all might consider waking the :k_confused: up. :yep:

:salute:

:hmmm: I bet sleepy joe wears the same pajamas.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QEE141IC4Q8/hqdefault.jpg

Meanwhile..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OagYlYna75Y

There are some points to ponder-

-Where's the PRC? I thought China was a close peer to the US? Why aren't they in the thick of the negotiations? :doh:

Otherwise, Peter does have some points. Unless he's dead-###ed wrong. :doh:
If that's the case, I'm sure he'll post a mea culpa on YouTube :har: or you can hire him to speak to your group. :up:

Nigel Farage exposes what happened when Denmark took in Palestinian refugees: 'Why on earth should we risk our national security?!'

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other...225f6a24e&ei=9

It's time our European governments faced up to these facts and gave any migrant with a criminal record the boot, will it happen in the UK? hehehe, not with two migrant leaders who are just waving these migrant currants through customs on a daily basis it wont.

Perhaps Markus can say if that link is true or not?, because I don't know what to believe anymore, the lies being spouted by these media outlets can't be trusted to tell the truth as they all seem to have a different agenda to us.

& That article leaves a lot of food for thought.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonlight (Post 2888826)

Following is copied and translated from the Danish wiki

Quote:

The Palestinian law

Palestinians had traveled from Lebanon to Denmark during 1990 and 1991, where they sought asylum on a claim that they were persecuted in Lebanon. But a tightening of case practice in the Directorate for Aliens and in the Refugee Board under the KVR government in the autumn of 1989 meant that a previous practice of automatically granting asylum to Palestinians from Lebanon had been changed, so that the cases were now assessed individually. This contributed to the assessment that 321 Palestinians were not persecuted in Lebanon and thus had their application for asylum rejected.

After the refusal, a group of 96 Palestinians chose to occupy Enghave Church and shortly after, between 7 and 8 September 1991, Blågårds Church, where parish priest Lisbeth Søe invited them inside. The occupation of Blågårds Church lasted for over five months.

The Palestinians aroused sympathy among a number of Danish organizations and individuals. 600 Danish priests signed a letter of support calling for residence permits, Danish BZers occupied the Directorate for Immigration and the Ministry of Justice in protest against the refusal of asylum. The support group was later called a "coalition of BZs, priests and humanists"

On 3 March 1992, a majority in the Folketing consisting of the Social Democracy, the Radical Left and the Socialist People's Party chose to bypass the KV government to grant collective residence permits to all Palestinians who had stayed in Denmark for more than 12 months. The law was colloquially referred to as the Palestine Law. Immediately after the adoption, many of the Palestinians chose to go back to Lebanon to celebrate the residence permit in Denmark - despite the fact that they had claimed that they had been persecuted in Lebanon.

It further emerged that 312 of the 321 allegedly persecuted Palestinians had traveled back and forth between Denmark and both Lebanon and Syria during 1990 and 1991, while they had sought asylum in Denmark, among other things to get married.

This is how it has gone for the 321 Palestinians

A study from 2003 showed that 42 percent of the 321 people who were granted asylum have since been convicted of crime, and that 74 percent of them were in some form on transfer income, including early retirement.
An estimate from 2005 showed that 56 percent of the children of the Palestinian church occupiers have been punished for crime

I thought it was better this way to copy and paste what the Danish wiki have written about the Palestinian.

So yes Nigel is correct.

Markus

Not like Nigel to be wrong :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc (Post 2888834)

So yes Nigel is correct.
Markus

Thankyou for confirming that Markus.

If only our current politicians had taken a leaf out of Nigel's book eh, you never know, they might never have got us into the mess we're in now in the first place.

The missile(S) launched from Yemen may not have been targeted on Israel. :yep:

Yemen has been chucking short range ballistics and drones at Saudi Arabia for a while now. I'd wait a bit before I assumed they were aimed at Israel or north eastern Egypt. I don't think Yemen has that kind of range.

Of course, Israel and Egypt were supposed to normalize relations so maybe they were pay-back or a warning to Egypt? :hmmm:

A war between USA and Iran keeps on getting closer.

Sooner or later Irans military aid to different terror group will one day backfire.

I'm convinced it will happen.

Markus

Doesn't really matter where the missiles were headed. What matters is the US announcing them shot down by a US warship to protect Israel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET2SN (Post 2888857)

Yemen missiles has that kind of range. The liquid-propellant missile that the Houthis has is the Toufan, which appears to be a rebranded Iranian Ghadr. The Toufan could have a 1,350–1,950 km range, potentially enough to place Israel within striking distance. In the past, the Houthis have made threats against Eilat and Tel Aviv. Iran continues to upgrade its long-range precision weaponry and, at least until recently, helped its local Yemeni ally Ansarullah to do the same with its own arsenal. With Iranian assistance, the Houthis have managed to build up an array of precision-guided rockets, ballistic missiles, land-attack cruise missiles and anti-shipping capabilities in a remarkably short period of time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc (Post 2888859)

A war between USA and Iran keeps on getting closer.

Sooner or later Irans military aid to different terror group will one day backfire.

I'm convinced it will happen.

Markus

I think Iran will avoid sparking a major confrontation with a technologically superior foe Markus, those oil fields they've got will make a tempting target for any retaliatory strikes, Iran will know this as well so they wont want that to happen or it will send their economy into meltdown.
No, they'll hide in the shadows as usual just like they always do, but, one day they might make a huge mistake which they can't back out of and, who knows what will happen then?.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonlight (Post 2888864)

I guess you're right- Maybe Iran seeks a military cooperation with Iraq and Syria. Iran and Syria is already working together, don't know about Iraq.

Well I think Iran is seeking support among the Islamic countries. First they will seek help from Iraq among the few.

However this could very well lead to a regional war down there.

Markus

Hamas has released two US hostages who were abducted during the Palestinian group's deadly raid on Israel this month.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67177249